Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 87 - 87
1 Dec 2013
Janz V Wassilew GI Matziolis G Tohtz S Perka C
Full Access

Introduction

The utilization of sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) has been shown to increase the detection rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in comparison to the use of conventional microbiological methods, because sonication enables a sampling of the causative bacteria directly from the surface of the endoprosthetic components. The hypothesis of this study is that not only will the detection rate of PJI be improved, but also the detection rate of polymicrobial infection in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgery.

Material and methods

74 patients which underwent TKA revision surgery received a synovial aspiration, intraoperative tissue cultures, histological sampling of the periprosthetic membrane, and sonication of the explanted endoprosthesis. A PJI was defined according to the following criteria: presence of intraarticular pus or a sinus tract, positive isolation of causative bacteria in ≥2 microbiological samples or a histological membrane indicative of infection (type II or III periprosthetic membrane).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 88 - 88
1 Dec 2013
Janz V Wassilew GI Tohtz S Perka C
Full Access

Introduction

Sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) are more sensitive than conventional microbiological methods in identifying periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), because sonication enables a sampling of the causative bacteria directly from the surface of the endoprosthetic components. Because of their high sensitivity SFC can be positive while all other microbiological methods remain negative. It is therefore difficult to interpret a single SFC as being truly or falsely positive. The aim of this prospective study was to improve the interpretation of SFC in the diagnosis of PJI in patients after total hip arthroplasty through the use of multiple SFC.

Material and methods

102 patients of which 37 had a defined PJI according to the following criteria were included: intraarticular pus or a sinus tract, a periprosthetic membrane (PM) indicative of infection, or a positive microbiological culture in a minimum of 2 separate microbiological samples. A single positive microbiological sample was classified as false positive. In 35 patients multiple SFC were acquired from the separate endoprosthetic components.