The biomechanical evaluation of tendon repair with collagen-based scaffolds in rat model is a common method to determine the functional outcome of the tested material. We introduced a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to verify the biomechanical test data. In present study different collagen scaffolds for tendon repair were examined.

Two collagen test materials: based on bovine stabilized collagen, chemically cross-linked with oriented collagenous fibres (material 1) and based on porcine dermal extracellular matrix, with no cross-linking (material 2) were compared. The animal study was approved by the local review board. Surgery was performed on male Sprague-Dawley rats with a body weight of 400 ± 19 g. Each rat underwent a 5 mm transection of the right Achilles tendon. The M. plantaris tendon was removed. The remaining tendon ends were re-joined with a 5 mm scaffold of either the material 1 or 2. Each scaffold material was sutured into place with two single stiches (Vicryl 4–0, Ethicon) each end. A total of 16 rats (n= 8 each group) were observed for 28 days follow up. The animals were sacrificed and hind limbs were transected proximal to the knee joint. MRI was performed using a 7 Tesla scanner (BioSpec 70/30, Bruker). T2-weighted TurboRARE sequences with an in-plane resolution of 0.12 mm and a slice thickness of 0.7 mm were analysed. All soft and hard tissues were removed from the Achilles tendon-calcaneus-foot complex before biomechanical testing. Subsequently, the specimens were fixed in a materials testing machine (Z1.0, Zwick, Ulm, Germany) for tensile testing. All tendons were preloaded with 1 N and subsequently stretched at a rate of 1 mm/s until complete failure was observed. Non-operated tendons were used as a control (n=4).

After 28 postoperative days, MRI demonstrated that four scaffolds (material 1: n=2, material 2: n=2) were slightly dislocated in the proximal part of hind limb. In total five failures of reconstruction could be detected in the tendon repairs (material 1: n=3, material 2: n=2). Tendons augmented with the bovine material 1 showed a maximum tensile load of 57.9 ± 17.9 N and tendons with porcine scaffold material 2 of 63.1 ± 19.5 N. The native tendons demonstrated only slightly higher loads of 76.6 ± 11.6 N. Maximum failure load of the tendon-scaffold construct in both groups did not differ significantly (p < 0.05). Stiffness of the tendons treated with the bovine scaffold (9.9 ± 3.6 N/mm) and with the porcine scaffold (10.7 ± 2.7 N/mm) showed no differences. Stiffness of the native healthy tendon of the contralateral site was significantly higher (20.2 ± 6.6 N/mm, p < 0.05). No differences in the mechanical properties between samples of both scaffold groups could be detected, regardless of whether the repaired tendon defect has failed or the scaffold has been dislocated.

The results show that MRI is important as an auxiliary tool to verify the biomechanical outcome of tendon repair in animal models.

Shock wave treatment has been shown to induce new bone formation both under physiologic conditions and during fracture repair. Whereas various underlying molecular working mechanisms have been shown in recent studies, no study has assessed the influence of varying energy flux densities (EFD) on the amount of new bone formation in vivo. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the effect of shock waves on bone is dependent on the applied EFD and if so, to identify the minimal dose necessary to induce new bone formation in vivo to avoid unwanted side effects of high-energy shock waves.

To this end, 30 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided in 5 groups and treated with extracorporeal shock waves at the distal femoral region (1,500 pulses at 1 Hz frequency each):

(a) control (sham treatment),

To investigate new bone formation, animals were injected with oxytetracycline at the days 5 to 9 after shock wave application and sacrificed on day 10. Histological sections of treated and untreated femora of all animals were examined using broad-band epifluorescent illumination and contact microradiography. The amount of new periosteal and endosteal bone was measured and signs of periosteal detachment, cortical fractures, and fragmented trabecular bone with callus were recorded.

Application of shock waves showed new bone formation beginning with 0.5 mJ/mm2 EFD and increasing with 0.9 mJ/mm2 and 1.2 mJ/mm2. The latter EFD resulted in new bone formation also on the opposite cortical bone and cortical fractures and periosteal detachment occurred. EFD of 0.35 mJ/mm2 did not lead to any new bone formation. Here for the first time a threshold level is presented for new bone formation after applying shock waves to intact bone in vivo.

We conclude that the results presented here have significant impact on further clinical applications of shock waves on bone tissue. In the present study, it is clearly demonstrated that the amount of new bone formation is directly dependent on the applied EFD. If the applied EFD is to low, no significant new bone formation will occur. If it is too high, unwanted side effects, like the formation of bone spurs in the shoulder or nerve entrapment syndromes in the elbow or feet by bony overgrowth may result.

Aims: Little is known about effects of extracorporeal shock wave application (ESWA) on normal bone physiology. Therefore, we investigated ESWA effects on intact distal rabbit femura as an in vivo animal model. Methods: Animals received 1,500 SW pulses each of different energy ßux densities (EFD) on either left or right femur or remained untreated. ESWA effects were investigated by bone scintigraphy, MRI and histopathological examination. Results: Ten days after ESWA, local blood ßow and bone metabolism were decreased (0.5 mJ/mm2 and 0.9 mJ/mm2 EFD), but were increased 28 days after ESWA (0.9 mJ/mm2). ESWA with 0.9 mJ/mm2 EFD (but not with 0.5 mJ/mm2 ) resulted in MRI signs of soft-tissue-edema, epiperiosteal ßuid and bone marrow edema one day after ESWA, as well as in hemosiderin deposits found epiperiosteally and within the marrow cavity ten days after ESWA. Conclusions: ESWA with both 0.5 mJ/mm2 and 0.9 mJ/mm2 EFD had effects on normal bone physiology in the distal rabbit femur, with considerable damaging side effects of ESWA with 0.9 mJ/mm2 EFD on periosteal soft tissue and tissue within the bone marrow

There is little information about the effects of extracorporeal shock-wave about application the effects (ESWA) of on normal bone physiology. We have therefore investigated the effects of ESWA on intact distal rabbit femora in vivo. The animals received 1500 shock-wave pulses each of different energy flux densities (EFD) on either the left or right femur or remained untreated. The effects were studied by bone scintigraphy, MRI and histopathological examination.

Ten days after ESWA (0.5 mJ/mm² and 0.9 mJ/mm² EFD), local blood flow and bone metabolism were decreased, but were increased 28 days after ESWA (0.9 mJ/mm²). One day after ESWA with 0.9 mJ/mm² EFD but not with 0.5 mJ/mm², there were signs of soft-tissue oedema, epiperiosteal fluid and bone-marrow oedema on MRI. In addition, deposits of haemosiderin were found epiperiosteally and within the marrow cavity ten days after ESWA.

We conclude that ESWA with both 0.5 mJ/mm² and 0.9 mJ/mm² EFD affected the normal bone physiology in the distal rabbit femur. Considerable damaging side-effects were observed with 0.9 mJ/mm² EFD on periosteal soft tissue and tissue within the bone-marrow cavity.