Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for acetabular dysplasia. It has also been proposed as a treatment for patients with acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to test whether outcome is equivalent for both types of morphology and identify factors that influenced outcome. A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with acetabular retroversion treated with PAO (n = 62 hips). Acetabular retroversion was diagnosed clinically and radiologically (presence of a crossover sign, posterior wall sign, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) between 20° and 35°). Outcomes were compared with a control group of patients undergoing PAO for dysplasia (LCEA < 20°; n = 86 hips). Femoral version was recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and reoperation rates were measured.Aims
Methods
The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists. We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology. We retrospectively reviewed the PAO's performed from 2014–2017, for symptomatic dysplasia in our unit (single-surgeon, minimum 1-year follow-up). All patients with adequate pelvic radiographs were included. Radiographic parameters of dysplasia were measured from pre- and post-operative AP pelvic radiographs using a validated software (Introduction
Methods
Peri-acetabular-osteotomy (PAO) was initially described for the correction of acetabular dysplasia. Anteverting PAO is an established treatment for acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to (1) Test whether PAO outcome is equivalent in different types of deformity (classic dysplasia vs. retroversion) and (2) Determine whether outcome in acetabular retroversion is different between impinging-only hip and hips with combined pathology (impingement & dysplasia). A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed on a group of patients (n=183) with acetabular retroversion (n=90) or lateral-under-coverage dysplasia (n=93) treated with PAO. Acetabular deformity was defined on pelvic radiographs and 3-D CTs using a number of parameters. Hips with retroversion, were sub-divided into combined pathology - retroversion with dysplasia (lateral centre-edge [LCEA] < 25°), or retroversion-only (LCEA≥25°). The mean age at time of the procedure was 29+/−7 years and most hips were in females (n=171). Complication (as per Dindo-Clavien)-, re-operation-, hip preservation rates and patient-reported-outcome measures were measured using the Non-Arthroplasty-Hip-Score (NAHS).Introduction
Methods
Hip Osteoarthritis (HOA) is a highly heterogeneous disease with potentially different genetic aetiologies. Thus far, few genetic variants have been robustly associated with broad definitions of HOA. We aimed to identify novel HOA susceptibility variants by examining a set of more homogeneous, radiographically-derived endophenotypes relating to anatomic pattern of joint involvement and bone remodelling response in HOA. Individuals with HOA and AP-hip radiographs (n=2,109) were selected from the arcOGEN study, genotyped on 2 platforms. The most arthritic hip per patient was categorised using Bombelli's classification (atrophic/normotrophic/hypertrophic), and for pattern of joint space narrowing (superior/medial-axial/concentric). Following 1000-Genomes-Project-based imputation and stringent quality control over 7 million variants were tested for association with each phenotype under the additive model. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to combine the results from the two GWA studies. In the discovery GWAS of atrophic HOA vs cases with non-atrophic HOA a strong signal (rs16869403, OR[95% CI]=2.47[1.81–3.38], p=1.53×10−8) was detected in the G protein-coupled receptor, Introduction
Materials, Methods and Results