There are few studies that have compared between continuous flexion activities and extension activities of normal knees. The purpose of this study is to compare in vivo kinematic comparison of normal knees between flexion activities and extension activities. Total of 8 normal male knees were investigated. We evaluated in vivo three-dimensional kinematics using 2D/3D registration technique. We compared femoral rotation angle relative to tibia, anterior/posterior (AP) translation of medial femoral sulcus (medial side) and lateral femoral epicondyle (lateral side) onto tibial plane perpendicular to tibial functional axis between flexion activities (F groups) and extension activities (E groups). Femoral external rotation was observed with the knee bending during both groups. The external rotation angle of F group was larger than that of E group significantly from 20 to 30 degrees with flexion (p < 0.05). Regarding medial side, anterior translation was observed up to 40 degrees in F group. From 40 to 140 degrees, posterior translation was observed. In E group, anterior translation was observed from 140 to 40 degrees with extension. From 40 degrees, posterior translation was observed. From 30 to 40 degrees, F group located anterior than E group (p < 0.05). Regarding lateral side, posterior translation was observed with flexion in F group. On the other hand, anterior translation was observed with extension in E group. Regarding AP location with flexion angle, there was no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, there were different kinematics between flexion activities and extension activities.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of normal knees in deep knee-bending motions like squatting and kneeling.

Material & Methods: We investigated the in vivo kinematics of 4 Japanese healthy male volunteers (8 normal knees in squatting, 7 normal knees in kneeling). Each sequential motion was performed under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane. Femorotibial motion was analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femur and tibia from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the femoral rotation relative to the tibia and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the femoral sulcus and lateral epicondyle on the plane perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis. Student's t test was used to analyze differences in the absolute value of axial rotation and AP translation of the femoral sulcus and lateral epicondyle during squatting and kneeling. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

During squatting, knees were gradually flexed from −2.8 ± 1.3° to 145.5 ± 5.1° on average. Knees were gradually flexed from 100.8 ± 3.9° to 155.6 ± 3.2° on average during kneeling. Femurs during squatting displayed sharp external rotation relative to the tibia from 0° to 30° of flexion and it reached 12.5 ± 3.3° on average. From 30° to 130° of flexion, the femoral external rotation showed gradually, and it reached 19.1 ± 7.3° on average. From 130° to 140° of flexion, it was observed additionally, and reached 22.4 ± 6.1° on average. All kneeling knees displayed femoral external rotation relative to the tibia sharply from 100° to 150° of flexion, and it reached 20.7 ± 7.5° on average. From 100° to 120° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during squatting was larger than that during kneeling significantly. From 120° to 140° of flexion, there was no significant difference between squatting and kneeling. The sulcus during squatting moved 4.1 ± 4.8 mm anterior from 0° to 60° of flexion. From 60° of flexion it moved 13.6 ± 13.4 mm posterior. The sulcus during kneeling was not indicated significant movement with the knee flexion. The lateral epicondyle during squatting moved 39.4 ± 7.7 mm posterior from 0° to 140° of flexion. The lateral epicondyle during kneeling moved 22.0 ± 5.4 mm posterior movement from 100° to 150° of flexion. In AP translation of the sulcus from 100° to 140° of flexion, there was no significant difference between squatting and kneeling. However in that of the lateral epicondyle, squatting groups moved posterior significantly.

Even if they were same deep knee-bending, the kinematics were different because of the differences of daily motions. The results in this study demonstrated that in vivo kinematics of deep knee-bending were different between squatting and kneeling.