Patient self-reported outcome scales have recently been used to evaluate total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. Many follow-up studies have been conducted on patients undergoing TKA; however, they have mostly reported outcomes after unilateral TKA. We believe that a longitudinal study after bilateral TKA will be more useful in evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of such patients. The objective of this study was to longitudinally evaluate QOL using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM). Objective outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) for more than 5 years after bilateral TKA. Furthermore, QOL and objective outcomes were compared between younger (age ≤ 80 years at the final follow-up point) and older (age > 80 years) age groups.Introduction
Objectives
The popliteus tendon is a component of the posterolateral corner of the knee, which controls the external rotation of the tibia. In our clinical practice, the femoral footprint of the popliteus tendon is occasionally excised as the bone is resected during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although the excision of the popliteus tendon femoral footprint could result in excessive external rotation of the tibia and may have adverse effects on the long-term outcomes of TKA, little attention has been paid to the popliteus tendon femoral footprint during TKA. The purpose of the present study is to assess the frequency of the excision and its associated risk factors. One hundred eleven knees of 90 patients with varus knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were included in the present study. There were 13 males and 77 females, and their average age was 74 years. The NexGen knee replacement system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) was used in all cases. The excision of the popliteus tendon femoral footprint was intraoperatively evaluated, and the patients were divided into three groups depending on the status of the femoral footprint, i.e., the preserved, partially excised, and completely excised groups. The thickness of the distal femoral osteotomy, femoral component size, and background data including height, body weight, gender, and age were compared among these groups. Analysis of variance followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test were used to compare the continuous values and ordinal scales. Gender was compared using Fisher's exact test and residual analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Methods
