It is well accepted that gap balancing is one of the important step for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In order to evaluate gap balancing during operation, many tension devises have been used and developed. However, during operation, proper load to be applied, ideal gap amount, appropriate angle formed between femoral component and tibial cut surface are not clearly defined. Understanding the relationship between applied load and gap pattern will provide important information. The purpose of this study is to precisely analyze gap amount and inclination in extension and flexion using digital analyzer during TKA and characterize gap pattern. We analyzed 39 knees in 39 cases that underwent TKA with Scorpio NRG PS knee prosthesis operated by modified gap balancing technique. A customized digital knee balancer was manufactured applying load cell, angle sensor, and gap sensor in the selected part within offset seesaw type balancer (Fig 1). It can measure three values (gap, angle and force) at the same time and automatically record the values. After bone cut for femur, tibia, and patella, femoral component trial was inserted to the femur. Then gap length and inclination angle between femoral condyle surface and tibial cut surface was analyzed in extension and at 90 degrees knee flexion with gradually increasing opening torque. Inclination was expressed by positive degrees when lateral side opened. Serial data was recorded automatically and analyzed.Backgrounds
Methods
Most of in vivo kinematic studies of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have reported on varus knee. TKA for the valgus knee deformity is a surgical challenge. The purposes of the current study are to analyze the in vivo kinematic motion and to compare kinematic patterns between weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) knee flexion in posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing TKA with pre-operative valgus deformity. A total of sixteen valgus knees in 12 cases that underwent TKA with Scorpio NRG PS knee prosthesis operated by modified gap balancing technique were evaluated. The mean preoperative femorotibial angle (FTA) was 156°±4.2°. During the surgery, distal femur and proximal tibia was cut perpendicular to the mechanical axis of each bone. After excision of the menisci and cruciate ligaments, balancer (Stryker joint dependent kinematics balancer) was inserted into the gap between both bones for evaluation of extension gap. Lateral release was performed in extension. Iliotibial bundle (ITB) was released from Gerdy tubercle then posterolateral capsule was released at the level of the proximal tibial cut surface. If still unbalanced, pie-crust ITB from inside-out was added at 1 cm above joint line until an even lateral and medial gap had been achieved. Flexion gap balance was obtained predominantly by the bone cut of the posterior femoral condyle. Good postoperative stability in extension and flexion was confirmed by stress roentgenogram and axial radiography of the distal femur. We evaluated the in vivo kinematics of the knee using fluoroscopy and femorotibial translation relative to the tibial tray using a 2-dimentional to 3-dimensional registration technique.Backgrounds
Methods
Chronic massive rotator cuff tears are challenging to repair completely because of the development of tendon retraction with inelasticity, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and MRI findings after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears. From 2011 to 2013, 12 shoulders in 12 consecutive patients (mean, 70.8 years) with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears underwent ASCR using fascia lata. We used suture anchors to attach the graft medially to the glenoid superior tubercle and laterally to the greater tuberosity as same technique by Mihata et al. We added side-to-side sutures between the graft and infraspinatus tendon and between the graft and residual anterior supraspinatus/subscapularis tendon to improve force coupling. Physical examination, clinical rating system, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed before surgery; at 6 and 12 months after surgery; and 6 months thereafter. Average follow-up was 19.1 months (12 to 28 months) after surgery. We assessed patients preoperatively by using the scoring systems of the shoulder index of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and the University of California, Los Angeles.Purpose
Methods
