Numerous procedures have been reported for the hallux valgus correction of the great toe. Scarf osteotomy is a versatile osteotomy to correct varying degrees of mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity. It can also be used for lengthening of the 1st ray as a revision procedure to treat metatarsalgia in patients who had previous shortening osteotomy.

We wish to report a patient who had lengthening SCARF osteotomy for the metatarsalgia following previous hallux valgus correction and developed arthritis of the 1st MTPJ in a short term which required fusion. A 49 year old female patient was seen with pain and tenderness over the heads of the 2nd and3rd metatarsal of the right foot. She had hallux valgus correction 10years ago with a shortening osteotomy of the 1st metatarsal. She developed metatarsalgia which failed to conservative management.

She had a lengthening SCARF osteotomy for the metatarsalgia in 2004. She had good symptomatic relief for two years and then started having pain over the 1st MTPJ. On examination she had limited movements of the 1st MTPJ and tenderness over the dorsolateral aspects of the 1st MTPJ suggestive of arthritis. Radiographs of the foot showed healed osteotomy with no evidence of AVN of the 1st MT head but features suggestive of osteoarthritis. She had fusion of the 1st MTPJ performed in 2008 for the arthritis following which symptoms resolved.

This case highlights that arthritis of the 1st MTPJ can occur in the absence of an AVN of the metatarsal head and patients need to be warned of this potential complaining when having the lengthening SCARF osteotomy for metatarsalgia following a previous shortening osteotomy of the 1st ray.

Numerous techniques are used for the fusion of failed TAR. We wish to report our results of the revision of failed TAR to fusion.

Between July 2005 and February 2011 the senior author had performed 20 arthrodeses in 19 patients (13 male and 6 female) who had failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAR). Their mean age was 63.5 years. All of them had the AES total ankle replacement. (Biomet UK). The mean period from the original TAR to fusion was 51 months (6 to72). The indication for revision of TAR to fusion was septic loosening in 4 patients and osteolysis and or aseptic loosening in 16 cases. Three types of fusion techniques were used.

The mean follow-up was 15 months. All 3 tibiotalar arthrodeses with screws alone fused successfully. Of the 13 patients where the fusion was augmented with an Ilizarov frame, 4 were done for septic loosening. There were 2 non unions of which one was stable without pain and the other required a further revision fusion with a frame and subsequently fused. Of the 9 patients who had a fusion with a frame for osteolysis and or aseptic loosening, there was one non union which was revised to a tibiotalocalacaneal fusion with a hind foot nail. The nail fractured at the level of the posterior oblique screw hole. The patient subsequently developed a relatively pain free non-union of the tibiotalar joint and not required further surgical intervention. The remaining 8 ankles fused at a mean of 5 months. The average time of frame removal was 17 weeks. There was four pin-site infection all of which settled with oral antibiotics. 5 patients had tibiotalocalacaneal fusion with a hind foot nail. The indication for the hind foot nail was significant osteolysis and loss of talar bone stock. The average shortening as a result of the fusion for the failed TAR was 1.5cms.

Our results were comparable to the previous reports of arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. We recommend the use of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a hind foot nail in the presence of severe osteolysis or accompanying subtalar arthritis. In the presence of good bone stock an ankle fusion supplemented with a circular frame gives a good predictable outcome.

Lisfranc injuries are not the common injuries of foot and ankle but there has been an increase in the incidence of these injuries due to road traffic accidents and fall from heights. We wish to present our retrospective case series of the operative management of the Lisfranc injuries by our senior author.

We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with Lisfranc injuries who were managed operatively by the senior author over the last six years. The case note and the radiographs including the CT scans were reviewed. All of them were treated with open reduction and internal fixation within three weeks of injury. The male: female ratio was 43:25. 37 right: 31 left sided injuries. The average age was 40.6 years (range 16 – 81 years). The most common mechanism of injury was fall from steps at home followed by motor bike accident. They average follow-up was 19.5 months and they were assessed both clinically and radiographically at each follow-up.

The k wires were removed at an average of six weeks. 96% were pain free and fully weight bearing after six months. Two patients had lateral scar tenderness. Majority of them returned to normal activities at an average of 12 months. Two patients had initial wound complications which were treated successfully with oral antibiotics. None of them had degenerative changes.

Our results of early open reduction and internal fixation were comparable to the published literature.