The number of total knee arthroplasties continues to increase annually with over 90,000 total knee replacements performed in the United Kingdom in 2018. Multiple national bodies including the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) and the British Orthopaedic Association collaborated in July 2019 to produce best practice guidance for knee arthroplasty surgery. This study aims to review practice in a regional healthcare trust against these guidelines.

Fifty total knee replacement operation notes were reviewed between January and February 2020 from 11 different consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Documents were assessed against 17 criteria recommended by the BASK guidance. Personnel names and grades were generally well documented. Tourniquet time and pressure were documented in over 98% of operation notes however, protection from spirit burns was not documented at all. Trialling and soft tissue balancing was well recorded in 100% and 96% of operation notes respectively.

Areas lacking in documentation included methods utilised to optimise cementation technique and removal of cement debris. Protection of key knee structures was documented in only 56% of operation notes clearly. Prior to closure, final assessment of mechanism integrity, collateral ligament was not documented at all and final ROM after implantation of components was recorded 34% of the time.

Subsequently authors have created a universal operation note template, uploaded onto the patient electronic notes, which prompts surgeons to complete documentation of the relevant criteria advocated by BASK.

In conclusion, detailed and systematic documentation is vital to prevent adverse events and reduce the risk of litigation. By producing detailed operative templates this risk can be mitigated.

Telemedicine is the delivery of healthcare from a remote location using integrated computer/communication technology. This systematic review aims to explore evidence for telemedicine in orthopaedics to determine its advantages, validity, effectiveness and utilisation particularly during our current pandemic where patient contact is limited.

Databases of PubMed, Scopus and CINHAL were systematically searched and articles were included if they involved any form of telephone or video consultation in an orthopaedic population. Findings were synthesised into four themes: patient/clinician satisfaction, accuracy and validity of examination, safety and patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. Quality assessment was undertaken using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools.

Twenty studies were included consisting of nine RCTs across numerous orthopaedic subspecialties including fracture care, elective orthopaedics and oncology. Studies revealed high patient satisfaction with telemedicine for convenience, less waiting and travelling time. Telemedicine was cost effective particularly if patients had to travel long distances, required hospital transport or time off work. No clinically significant differences were found in patient examination nor measurement of patient reported outcome measures. Telemedicine was reported to be a safe method of consultation. However, studies were of variable methodological quality with selection bias.

In conclusion, evidence suggests that telemedicine in orthopaedics can be safe, cost effective, valid in clinical assessment with high patient/clinician satisfaction. Further work with high quality RCTs is required to elucidate long term outcomes. This systematic review presents up-to-date evidence on the use of telemedicine and provides data for organisations considering its use in the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.