The Capital Hip implant was a Charnley-based system which included a flanged and a roundback stem, both of which were available in stainless steel and titanium. The system was withdrawn from the market because of its inferior performance. However, all four of the designs did not produce poor rates of survival. Using a simulated-based, finite-element analysis, we have analysed the Capital Hip system. Our aim was to investigate whether our simulation was able to detect differences which could account for the varying survival between the Capital Hip designs, thereby further validating the simulation.

We created finite-element models of reconstructions with the flanged and roundback Capital Hips. A loading history was applied representing normal walking and stair-climbing, while we monitored the formation of fatigue cracks in the cement.

Corresponding to the clinical findings, our simulation was able to detect the negative effects of the titanium material and the flanged design in the Capital Hip system. Although improvements could be made by including the effect of the roughness of the surface of the stem, our study increased the value of the model as a predictive tool for determining failure of an implant.

Proper pre-clinical testing of cemented THA implants may help to prevent bad implants from entering the market. Within the frame of a multinational EU-program, a finite element (FE) simulation was developed, for FE-based pre-clinical testing of cemented THA stems against the damage accumulation failure scenario. The simulation allows monitoring of cement crack formation and implant migration in cemented THA reconstructions. The current study is concerned with the clinical validation of the test. The damage accumulation failure scenario was simulated for four cemented hip stems, with well-known survival rates. The question was: Can the FE simulation rank the stems according to their clinical survival rates?

Four stems were analysed: the Lubinus SPII, the Exeter, the Charnley and the Mueller Curved. The Swedish hip register [1] reports survival rates of 4, 5, 8 and 13%, respectively, at 10 years after surgery. Four FE models were created, representing cemented THA reconstructions with the four stems in composite femurs. The stem-cement interfaces were unbonded (m = 0.25). A loading history was applied to the models, representing 20 million cycles of alternating walking and stair climbing. Using a 3D continuum damage mechanics approach, the damage accumulation and creep processes in the cement, and subsequent prosthetic migration were monitored.

The Mueller C. produced a considerably higher number of cement cracks than the other three stems. Cracks were formed around the entire stem. The cracked zones often extended over the thickness of the mantle. The Charnley performed better, with a lower number of cracks. Proximo-distal damage pathways were formed, although at a much lower rate than around the Mueller C. The Exeter performed better. Full thickness crack zones were produced only in the proximo-medial region. The Lubinus performed best, with the lowest number of cement cracks. No full thickness cracks were formed. Concerning migration, the Exeter migrated more than the other stems. From the collared implants, the Lubinus SPII showed the lowest migration values.

When considering the number of cement cracks produced in the simulation, the ranking of the stems would be, from superior to inferior: Lubinus SPII, Exeter, Charnley, Mueller Curved. This ranking corresponds to a ranking based on clinical survival rates. The stems behaved according to their design concepts, with the highest migration values for the Exeter stem. In conclusion, the FE simulations produced a clinically valid ranking of four cemented THA implants. This corroborates the use of the FE simulation for pre-clinical testing purposes.