Local bone-related adverse events occur more frequently following metal-on metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR) versus convention total hip arthroplasty (THA). High local tissue levels of cobalt and chromium may contribute to impaired bone health, however the systemic effects on bone of exposure to elevated metal levels after MOMHR are unknown. In this cross-sectional study we compared whole body bone mineral density (WB-BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in 31 healthy male subjects at a mean of 8 years after MOMHR versus 31 individually age and time since surgery matched male subjects after conventional THA. All subjects had well-functioning prostheses and were in good self-reported health as assessed by Oxford Hip Score and EQ-5D questionnaire. WB-BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and adjusted for pre-morbid osteoporosis risk factors using the FRAX tool, and for the presence of the metal prostheses using identical exclusion regions. Bone turnover markers were measured on fasting morning serum or 24hr urine collection by electro-chemiluminescent assay. Cobalt and chromium were measured by ICP-MS.Background and objectives
Methods
We aimed to evaluate the precision and longitudinal sensitivity of measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in the pelvis and to determine the effect of bone cement on the measurement of BMD in femoral regions of interest (ROI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A series of 29 patients had duplicate dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip within 13 months of THA. Pelvic analyses using 3- and 4-ROI models gave a coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.5% to 3.6% and of 2.5% to 4.8%, respectively. Repeat scans in 17 subjects one year later showed a significant change in BMD in three regions using the 4-ROI model, compared with change in only one region with the 3-ROI model (p <
0.05). Manual exclusion of cement from femoral ROIs increased the net CV from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.001), and decreased the measured BMD by 20% (t = 12.1, p <
0.001). Studies of two cement phantoms in vitro showed a small downward drift in bone cement BMD giving a measurement error of less than 0.03 g/cm2/year associated with inclusion of cement in femoral ROIs. Changes in pelvic periprosthetic BMD are best detected using a 4-ROI model. Analysis of femoral ROI is more precise without exclusion of cement although an awareness of its effect on the measurement of the BMD is needed.
Secondary sterilisation of allograft bone by gamma irradiation is common, but the conditions under which it is performed vary between tissue banks. Some do so at room temperature, others while the bone is frozen. Bone is made brittle by irradiation because of the destruction of collagen alpha chains, probably mediated by free radicals generated from water molecules. Freezing reduces the mobility of water molecules and may therefore decrease the production of free radicals. We found that bone irradiated at −78°C was less brittle and had less collagen damage than when irradiated at room temperature. These findings may have implications for bone-banking.
There have been conflicting reports on the effects of gamma irradiation on the material properties of cortical allograft bone. To investigate changes which result from the method of preparation, test samples must be produced with similar mechanical properties to minimise variations other than those resulting from treatment. We describe a new method for the comparative measurement of bone strength using standard bone samples. We used 233 samples from six cadavers to study the effects of irradiation at a standard dose (28 kGy) alone and combined with deep freezing. We also investigated the effects of varying the dose from 6.8 to 60 kGy (n = 132). None of the treatments had any effect on the elastic behaviour of the samples, but there was a reduction in strength to 64% of control values (p <
0.01) after irradiation with 28 kGy. There was also a dose-dependent reduction in strength and in the ability of the samples to absorb work before failure We suggest that irradiation may cause an alteration in the bone matrix of allograft bone, but provided it is used in situations in which loading is within its elastic region, then failure should not occur.
