High energy pelvic injury poses a challenging setting for the treating surgeon. Often multiple injuries are associated, which makes the measurement of short- and long-term functional outcomes a difficult task. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pelvic dysfunction and late impacts of high energy pelvic ring fractures on pelvic floor function in women, with respect to urinary, sexual and musculoskeletal function. This was compared to a similar cohort of women with lower limb fractures without pelvis involvement.

The data in our study was prospectively gathered between 2010 and 2013 on 229 adult females who sustained injury between 1998 and 2012. Besides demographic and operative variables, the scores of three validated health assessment tools were tabulated: King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). A multivariate regression analysis was done to compare groups.

The incidence of sexual dysfunction was 80.8% in the pelvis and 59.4% in the lower extremity group. A Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a significant difference in KHQ-score (p<0.01) with the pelvis group being worse. When adjusting for age, follow-up and Injury Severity Score this difference was not significant (p=0.28), as was for FSFI and SMFA score. The mean FSFI scores of both groups met the criteria for female sexual dysfunction (<26). Patients with a Tile C fracture have better FSFI scores (16.98) compared to Tile B fractures (10.12; p=0.02). Logistic regression predicting FSFI larger than 26.5 showed that older age and pelvic fractures have a higher likelihood having a form of sexual dysfunction.

Sexual dysfunction after lower extremity trauma is found in patients regardless of pelvic ring involvement. Urinary function is more impaired after pelvic injuries, but more data is needed to confirm this. Older age and pelvic fracture are predictors for sexual dysfunction in women. This study is important as it could help counsel patients on the likelihood of sexual dysfunction, something that is probably under-reported and recognized during our patient follow up.

Purpose: To determine the effect of delay to surgery on functional outcome in patients with operatively-treated acetabular fractures.

Method: Two hundred and thirty-two patients with acetabular fractures were identified from a pelvic trauma database. Functional outcome data was assessed using the validated Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys in 162 patients. After 1997, functional outcome scores were collected prospectively at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years (or greater) post-operatively. Functional outcome scores, quality of reduction, and risk of complications were modeled as a function of days of delay to surgery via multivariate regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, fracture type, and associated injuries.

Results: At 6 months post-operatively, functional outcome scores were significantly worse with increasing delay to surgery. A delay of between 7 and 13 days or 14 or more days decreased the SF-36 physical component (PCS) z-scores by 0.75 (95% CI: −1.41 to −0.09) and 1.5 standard deviations (95% CI: −2.43 to −0.56) respectively. Delay of 14 or more days was associated with a worsening of the lower extremity (Move) subsection of the MFA by 18.6 points (95% CI: 3.3 to 33.8). Delay to surgery was associated with a significantly higher risk of poor reduction among those with available radiographic follow-up (n=67). Delay 14 days or more was associated with a 5 times (95% CI?.04 to 23.99) greater risk of a post operative step or gap over 2 mm. Delay to surgery was associated with an increase in thrombotic complications. In those patients who were diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism(PE) the mean delay was 11.3 days versus 7.3 days for the rest of the cohort (p=0.01). For patients with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) average delay was 14.1 days versus 7.1 days (p=0.01).

Conclusion: Delay to surgery is associated with worsening functional outcome scores after as little as 7 days of delay. After 14 days, functional outcomes deteriorate further and radiographic outcomes are negatively influenced. Increased delay also increases risk of thrombotic events. These conclusions underscore the importance of timely treatment for displaced acetabular fractures.