Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a severe complication in terms of disability, morbidity, and cost. We performed a study to investigate whether early PJI (within 90 days of primary TKA) is associated with increased mortality. Secondary aims were to compare mortality rates over time and between surgical treatment methods. Patients with suspected PJI were identified by linkage of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR) in 2007–2008 and 2012–2013. Medical records of patients receiving more than 4 weeks of continuous antibiotic therapy were subsequently reviewed to verify the PJI diagnosis. Information on mortality was obtained through the SKAR which is updated daily from the tax agency and patients with PJI were compared to patients without PJI.Background
Methods
Strenuous efforts to minimize postoperative infection rates have been made, including the Swedish nation-wide initiative Prosthesis Related Infections Shall be Stopped (PRISS). The aim of this study was to calculate the incidence rate of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) before and after PRISS. All 45,438 primary TKAs registered in the Swedish knee arthroplasty register (SKAR) during 2007–2008 and 2012–2013 were included. Matched data on antibiotic prescriptions were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR). All patients with ≥28 days of continuous antibiotic treatment within 2 years of primary surgery had their medical charts reviewed to identify cases of PJI.Aim
Method
Reveal the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after primary hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory joint disease and analyse if the infection rate was correlated to the given anti-rheumatic treatment. The background is that since 2006 patients operated at the orthopaedic department at Skåne University hospital, Lund, Sweden, have continued treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors during the perioperative period. During 2006 to 2015 494 planned primary hip and knee arthroplasties were performed on 395 patients (236 hip arthroplasties and 239 knee arthroplasties). Data on age, sex, diagnosis, BMI, operation time, ASA-classification, treatment with cDMARDs (conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) and bDMARDs (biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs) and use of prednisolone was collected. The primary outcome variable was prosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 1 year from surgery with a secondary outcome variable being superficial SSI.Aim
Method
Patients reporting penicillin allergy do often receive clindamycin as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The effect of clindamycin has however not been compared to antibiotics with proven effect in joint arthroplasty surgery. The aim of the study was to reveal if there were differences in the rate of revision due to infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depending on which antibiotic was used as systemic prophylaxis. Patients reported to the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register having a TKA performed due to osteoarthritis (OA) during the years 2009 – 2015 were included in the study. The type of prophylactic antibiotic is individually registered. For 80,018 operations survival statistics were used to calculate the rate of revision due to infection until the end of 2015, comparing the group of patients receiving the beta-lactam cloxacillin with those receiving clindamycin as systemic prophylaxis.Aim
Method
To reveal if patient reported knee-related pain, function, quality of life, general health and satisfaction at one year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is different between patients not being subject to revision surgery and those having had early treatment with open debridement and exchange of the tibial insert for postoperative PJI. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register was used to identify 50 patients in the region of Skane that had a primary TKA during the years 2008 – 2012 and within 6 months were revised with open debridement and exchange of the tibial insert due to suspected or verified PJI. Only patients without further revisions were included. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were obtained preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively and included knee related pain, function, quality of life using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), general health using the EQ-VAS as well as satisfaction with the surgery. The scores were compared to those reported by 3,913 patients having a TKA during the same time but not revised during the first year. Welch's t-test and the Chi2-test were used in statistical analysis. Compared to the controls the infected patients were older (mean age 72 vs 69 years, p = 0.04) and were more morbid (ASA 3; 14/50 patients vs 14%, p = 0.02). The preoperative PROM data were similar. Complete 1 year PROM data was available for 31 of the patients. Those patients reported somewhat worse outcome one year postoperatively than the controls with statistically and clinically significant differences in general health (mean 61 vs 76, p=0.002), KOOS ADL (mean 65 vs 76, p=0.03) and knee related quality of life (mean 51 vs 63, p=0.02) with large variations on individual level. Just over half of the patients (17/29) treated for PJI were very satisfied or satisfied with the surgery compared to 79% of the controls. Patients treated with open debridement and exchange of the tibial insert due to early PJI after primary TKA reported less beneficial postoperative outcome than those without revision surgery during the first postoperative year but with large individual variations.
