Aim

There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures.

There has been evidence of association between femoral shaft fractures and prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. We present a case series of bisphosphonate-associated fractures and invaluable lessons we have learnt.

Over the last three years at our unit we have collected a case series of eight patients who have had atypical femoral fractures whilst on bisphosphonate therapy. We present illustrative cases, a summary of key findings, and invaluable lessons we have learnt.

There was a long period of prodromal pain for two years before incomplete fractures developed. We speculate this is a warning sign of impending fracture. This may have been prevented with screening. Between incomplete fracture and complete fracture there was a short window of one month. Five patients presented with complete fracture, and three with thigh pain +/- evidence of incomplete fracture. Of the latter group all but one went on to develop complete fractures. The one patient who did not progress died six years after diagnosis. Of those five patients who presented with initial complete fracture, three patients recall thigh pain before fracture on further questioning. Despite being diaphyseal femoral fractures, there is a higher risk of neck of femur fractures in this patient cohort (both patients with initial interlocked nails subsequently developed neck of femur fractures soon after and were revised to cephalomedullary nails). Excluding one death from unrelated cause, only one patient has signs of complete fracture healing. All other patients are still receiving follow-up (mean 490 days). Three patients reported bilateral symptoms (pain). Two had had bilateral symptoms for one year. Both had visible incomplete fractures on further radiographic scrutiny; one underwent prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing, one was managed with active surveillance.

We suggest that improved pain and radiographic changes of cortical healing may be misleading and should not be relied upon. Cephalomedullary nailing is the treatment of choice in these fractures due to higher risk of neck of femur fractures in this cohort. We suggest prompt prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing when radiographic incomplete fractures are identified due to a short window before progression to complete fracture, and the need to consider contralateral prophylactic nailing in patients describing bilateral symptoms. We speculate that thigh pain is a warning sign of impending fracture and fracture-progression can be prevented with appropriate screening.

Introduction

Bone loss in the distal femur and proximal tibia is frequently encountered with both complex primary and revision knee replacement surgery. Metaphyseal sleeves provide a good option for enhanced fixation in managing such defects on both the tibia and femur. We present our results in 48 patients (50 knees) with a minimum 12 month follow up (range 12 to 45).

Obtaining informed consent for an operation is a fundamental daily interaction between orthopaedic surgeon and patient. It is based on a patient's capacity to understand and retain information about the proposed procedure, the potential consequences of having it and the alternative options available. We used validated tests of memory on 59 patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty to assess how well they learned and recalled information about their planned procedure. All patients showed an ability to learn new material, however, younger age and higher educational achievement correlated with better performance. These results have serious implications for orthopaedic surgeons discussing planned procedures. They identify groups of patients who may require enhanced methods of communicating the objectives, risks and alternatives to surgery. Further research is necessary to assess interventions to improve communication prior to surgery.

Eradication of bacteria in forefoot surgery in necessary to prevent post-operative infections. Currently a lack of consensus exists on the optimum solution and preparation methods needed to achieve this. We compared the effect of povidine-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate on lowering bacterial load and if any additional benefits are gained by pre-treatment with the use of a bristled brush.

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing forefoot surgery were recruited into the study and randomised to receive one of two surgical skin preparations (Povidine-iodine 1% with isopropyl alcohol 23% or Chlorhexi-dine gluconate 0.5% with isopropyl alcohol 70%). In addition to the skin preparation of the foot with the randomised solution the other foot was also scrubbed with a sterile surgical bristled brush for a standardised period (3 minutes) and then painted again. Swabs were taken from three sites and analysed via qualitative and quantitative analysis.

All four methods significantly decreased (p < 0.001), in all three sites, the number of colony forming units. Using two-way analysis of variance no significant interaction was observed between site of swab and method of preparation (p =0.970). This confirms that no preparation method was more superior in reducing the number of CFUs at any site than the others.

We suggest that either povidone –iodine with no more that 23% isopropyl alcohol or chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% isopropyl alcohol be used for surgical preparation in forefoot surgery. No additional benefit in reduction in bacterial load is gained by scrubbing the foot prior to painting with bristles.

Aims: To evaluate the outcome of open excision of the Acromio-Clavicular Joint (ACJ) in isolated Acromio-Clavicular Joint osteoarthritis and compare it with the published rates for arthroscopic intervention.

Introduction: Anectdotally this operation has been reported as very successful. There are no reviews of this particular operation in the literature. Arthroscopic excision has been advocated as being successful in > 90% of patients in repeated studies.

Methods: A two year period of theatre records produced a group of patients who had undergone this procedure. Case-notes were obtained and the patients with isolated ACJ were identified. Information on patient demographics, duration of symptoms, length of operation, operative complications and follow up were obtained. The patients were contacted and asked to fill out a DASH form. They were invited to a research clinic for clinical review.

Results: 31 patients with 32 isolated osteoarthritic ACJs were identified. Ratio of men to women was 22:9. Mean age at surgery was 48 years. Duration of symptoms before surgery was 105 weeks (mean). Mean time of surgery was 17 minutes. 80% were discharged from follow up by 4 months, mean follow up being 12 weeks. Complications were limited to 2 superficial wound infections. One patient did not have resolution of symptoms.

DASH score results were excellent in all bar one of those returned.

Conclusion: This simple operation has been shown to be effective in 96.9% of patients. The complication rate was 6.2%. Patient satisfaction is high.

These results are comparable to the best results of arthroscopic ACJ Excision.