Background: Arthroscopic femoral osteoplasties might cause prolonged operative times, restricted intraop-erative overview or insufficient localisation of surgical tools. Computer assisted techniques should improve the precision with an overall accuracy is within 1mm/1°. An automated navigated registration process matching preoperative CT data and intraoperative fluoroscopy, should allow for non-invasive registration for FAI surgery. We evaluated the general precision (I) of the CT and fluoroscopic matching process and (II) the precision of identifying the defined osseous lesions in various anatomical areas.

Material and Methods: Three cadavers (6 hip joints) utilizing a conventional navigation system were used. Before preoperative CT scans, defined osseous lesion (0.5x0.5mm) in the femoral neck, head neck junction, head region were created under fluoroscopic control. Following reference marker fixation, two fluoroscopic images (12 inch c-arm) with 30° angle differences of the hip joint were taken. Automated segmentation including CT-fluoro image fusion by the navigation system enabled a noninvasive registration process Precision of registration process was tested with a straight navigated pointer (1mm tip) trough a lateral arthroscopic portal, during virtual contact to the bone, without arthroscopic control After arthroscopic view was enabled the in vivo distance of pointer tip to bone was measured (I). In vivo real distances between inserted navigated shaver and osseous lesions was done over an anterior hip arthrotomy. Under navigated control, blinded to the situ, placement in the lesions should be done. Distances between shaver tip and osseous lesions were measured with a caliper (II).

Results: The precision for registration (I) was within 0.9mm within the femoral neck (SD 0.24mm; 0.6–1.3mm); 1.2 mm (SD 0.33mm; 0.8–2.0mm) (p> 0.05) for the head neck junction; 2.9 mm (SD 0.57mm; 1.8–3.7mm) for the femoral head (p< 0.001 respectively p< 0.001) Mean offset of the navigated shaver to the lesions (II) was 0.93 mm (SD 0.65mm; 0–2mm). Within the femoral neck a mean accuracy of 0.6mm (SD 0.59mm; 0–1.4mm), the head neck junction 0.8 mm (SD 0.78mm; 0.1–1.5mm), the femoral head 1.3 mm (SD 0.50mm; 0.6–1.7mm) was found (p> 0.05; p> 0.05; p> 0.05).

Conclusion: A combined CT-fluoroscopy matching procedure allows for a reproducible noninvasive registration process for navigated FAI surgery. Precision of the registration process itself is more accurate at the femoral neck and head-neck junction than at the femoral head area. However a navigated identification of osseous lesions was possible within 1mm deviations in all regions.

Background: A navigated 8 in 1 femoral cutting guide for TKA that does not require primary fixation or intramedullary guides was developed. The hypothesis of our study were twofold: 1) the navigation system allows for precise alignment and adjustment of a new femoral 8 in 1 cutting guide with negligible variance in the initially planned vs. achieved implant position; 2) resulting femoral cuts are very accurate without relevant cutting errors.

Material and Methods: We demonstrate our approach with the Universal Knee Instrument (UKI, Precimed Inc. USA), a versatile 8 in 1 TKA guide designed to perform all femoral cuts with a single jig. We integrated an array of “adjustable constraints” into the UKI by machining four threaded holes directly through the template. Adaptation to a navigation system has been performed by integrating the adjustable constraints protocol on the open platform Surgetics Station (PRAXIM-medivision, France), which uses image-free BoneMorphing technology. Based on navigated bone morphing the required preadjustment of the guide was done mechanically, with depth control by mini screws. Testings on 10 cadavers compared the planned vs. achieved positions of the jig before, after fixation, final implant position and planned vs. achieved cutting procedures.

Results: Results revealed for valgus/varus deviations before fixation −0.1°±0.7°, after 0.0°±0.8° (p=0.51), final implant position 0.9°±1.7° (p=0.93). For flexion before fixation −0.3°±1.3° after −0.3°±1.8° (p=0.44), final position 2.9°±2.5° (p=0.65). Distal cut height before fixation 0.0°±0.4°, after 0.1°±0.3° (p=0.61), final position 0.3°±1.0° (p=0.1). Axial rotation before −0.3°±1.1°, after fixation 0.2°±1.4° (p=0.57), final implant position 0.8°±2.7° (p=0.89). Anterior-posterior positions before fixation 0.7°±1.4°, after 1.0°±1.6° (p=0.27), final position 3.4°±1.3° (p=0.13). Highest deviations in the planned vs. actual cut position was found for the posterior cut −3.1°±2.4° in sagittal and anterior cut 0.8°±1.9° in the coronal plane. The highest mean errors in the final implant position where on the order of 3 degrees/mm in flexion and anterior-posterior positioning.

Conclusion: A novel ‘CAS-enabled 8 in 1 jig’ has been developed and validated. The system allows for direct execution of a complex, multi-planar CAS plan with single navigated device. The instrumentation is considerably simplified and eliminates the problems associated with sequential jigs.