To assess the functional outcome of operative and non-operative treatment of distal humeral fractures in the elderly, patients above 75 years of age were studied. Demographic data including associated injuries and co-morbid conditions were recorded. The minimum follow-up was 16 months (range 16–92 months). Elbow function was analysed according to the OTA rating system. Radiographs were monitored for possible predictors of final functional outcome

Out of 125 patients with distal humeral fractures, 29 were above the age of 75 years. The mean age at the time of admission was 84.6 years (range 75–100). One patient was lost to follow-up. In total there were 28 patients with 29 fractures. 5 of these were open fractures. As per the AO classification, there were 8 type A, 8 type B, and 13 type C fractures. 8 patients were treated non-operatively (3 type A, 2 type B, 3 type C) and 21 (5 type A, 6 type B, 10 type C) operatively. An olecranon osteotomy was performed in 12 cases, 2 underwent triceps tongue reflection, and 7 had triceps splitting. Local complications included 4 cases (1 deep and 3 superficial) of infection and 3 non-unions (including one at the olecranon osteotomy). In the non-operative group the mean loss of extension and mean flexion achieved were 34.0 and 70.0 degrees respectively, whereas in the operative group the corresponding values were 23.0 and 107 degrees.

OTA grading revealed 3 excellent, 9 good, 7 fair and 2 poor results in the operated group whereas in the non-operated group there were 0 excellent, 2 good, 3 fair, and 3 poor results. There was direct correlation between loss of anterior tilt of the distal humerus and adverse outcome.

Conclusion: Our study showed that improved functional outcome can be achieved following surgical treatment in these difficult fracture This study supports the view that we need to re-examine the conventional view of ‘bag of bones’ method as blanket treatment and signifies the need for further studies on similar cohorts of patients.

Aims: To evaluate whether in children with knee pathology there is any correlation between clinical diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Methods: Between 1993 and 2001 children age 3–16 years old, who presented in the orthopaedic clinics of our institution with knee pathology were included in this study. All of them underwent MRI investigation. Their history, physical examination and clinical diagnosis were ascertained from their case notes. Some of these children underwent arthroscopic surgery of the knee and þndings were also recorded. Clinical data, MRI þndings and arthroscopic þndings were computerised and analysed. Results were analysed and compared in the following 3 groups: a) clinical data versus MRI þndings, b) clinical data versus arthroscopic þndings and c) MRI report versus arthroscopic þndings. Comparisons were rated in one of three categories: total agreement, partial agreement or total disagreement. Partial agreement was deþned as the partial correlation of þndings. Results: 130 children (131 knees, one bilateral) were included in this study. The mean age was 8.5 years (range 3–16). Conclusion: In this study 1/3 of the knee MRI was normal and there was only 26% of total agreement between the clinical and MRI þndings. Further more in 50% of cases that underwent arthroscopy, there was no correlation of arthroscopic and MRI þndings.This study supports the view that knee MRI investigation in children may not provide a reliable diagnosis and guidance in children with knee pathology.

Purpose: In the younger population there is substantial body of evidence that the outcome is better following open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. In the elderly however, there is a need to assess the value of internal fixation of these fractures where osteoporosis is almost a rule than exception and poses considerable challenge to even very experienced trauma surgeon. The purpose of this study therefore was to assess the functional outcome of operative fixation of fractures of the distal humerus in a cohort of elderly patients (aged 75 and above). The reproducibility of four different scoring systems is also evaluated.

Patients and Methods: Between 1996 and 2000 out 125 patients who were treated in our institution, elderly patients above 75 years of age were studied. Demographic data such as age, sex, associated injuries and the pre-admission elbow function were recorded. All the fractures were classified according to the AO/ASIF system. At final follow up elbow function was analyzed using OTA’s rating system and these results were compared using three other scoring systems (Jupiter’s criteria, Aitkin’s and Rorabeck criteria, and the scoring system of Caja et al). Treatment options, surgical or non surgical was based on the medical condition of the patient and the personality of the fracture. Intra-operative details including ulnar nerve transposition, olecranon osteotomy and quality of fixation were recorded and analysed. Serial radiographs were studied in detail for union, loss of reduction, certain prognostic indicators such as anterior tilt of distal humerus, cubitus angle, any articular step, gap, heterotopic ossification and development of degenerative changes. Radiological analysis was correlated with functional outcome. The minimum follow up was 16 months (range 16–92).

Results: Out of 125 patients, 29 (23.2%) were above the age of 75 (5 male). The mean age of the patients was 84.6 years (range 75–100). One patient was lost to follow-up. In total 28 patients were studied with 29 fractures (one bilateral), five open (Gustilo’s grade I). Mechanism of injury included 24 falls and 4 motor vehicle accidents. In seven cases associated injuries (three with ipsilateral upper limb injuries) were noted. Twenty patients (69.8%) had noticeable osteopenia in the x rays. According to the AO/ASIF classification, there were eight type A, eight type B and thirteen type C fractures. Eight patients were treated non-operatively (3 type A, 2 type B, 3 type C) and 21 (5 type A, 6 type B, 10 type C) operatively. The injury-surgery interval ranged from 6hours to 5days. An olecranon osteotomy (chevron type, Jupiter’s technique) was performed in 21 cases, 2 underwent Triceps ‘tongue’ reflection and 7 had triceps splitting. Only one case had anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve and none in the series developed ulnar nerve symptoms. Local complications included one case of deep infection (leading to non-union), three cases of superficial infection treated with antibiotics, 3 non-unions (two affecting the fracture and the other one the site of the olecranon osteotomy). The former patients declined further intervention and the latter patient was asymptomatic. One patient needed removal of olecranon metal ware, one developed olecranon bursitis. Heterotopic ossification was present in one patient with no effect on the elbow function. Overall, the mean loss of extension was 22.5° (range 5–40°) and the mean flexion 98.6° (ranged 40o–132°). In the non-operative group the mean loss of extension and mean flexion achieved were 33.5oand 70.1° respectively whereas in the operative group were 22.7oand 106.6°. OTA grading revealed 3‘excellent’, 9‘good’, 7‘fair’and 2 ‘poor’ results in the operated group whereas in the non-operative group there were no ‘excellent’, 2‘good’, 3‘fair’, 3‘poor’results. It is of note that in the non-operative group there was a 37.5% incidence of poor results significantly higher than the operative group. The number of ‘acceptable’ (excellent + good) results was higher in the surgically treated group (52%) than in the non-surgically treated group (25.0%). The functional outcome was most closely related to anatomical reduction of the fracture (particularly articular step < 2mm) and anterior tilt of the distal humerus and was unaffected by the injury-surgery interval. It was found that the Jupiter score was less rigid for the range of movement but produced similar scores to OTA with less potential inter observer error compared to the two other scoring systems. 18 of the 21(85.7%) the patients had no limitation of rotation.

Conclusion & Significance: This study supports the view that the functional outcome following distal humerus fractures is better with operative treatment in patients above the age of 75. Out of the 4 functional assessment scoring systems evaluated only the OTA and Jupiter gave similar results.

To evaluate whether in children with knee pathology there is any correlation between clinical diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy.

Between 1993 and 2001 children age 3–16 years old, who presented in the orthopaedic clinics of our institution with knee pathology were included in this study. All of them underwent MRI investigation. Their history, physical examination and clinical diagnosis were ascertained from their case notes. Some of these children underwent arthroscopic surgery of the knee and findings were also recorded. Clinical data, MRI findings and arthroscopic findings were computerised and analysed. Results were analysed and compared in the following 3 groups: a) clinical data versus MRI findings, b) clinical data versus arthroscopic findings and c) MRI report versus arthroscopic findings. Comparisons were rated in one of three categories: total agreement, partial agreement or total disagreement. Partial agreement was defined as the partial correlation of findings.

130 children (131 knees, one bilateral) were included in this study. The mean age was 8.5 years (range 3–16). 81 were male and 49 were female, ratio 1.7:1. 38 (30%) patients underwent arthroscopy. 43 (33%) of the MRI scans were reported as normal. Lesions reported on MRI included meniscal and ACL tears, osteochondritis dessicans, osteochondral fractures and discoid lateral meniscus. Overall, the results between the comparison of the 3 groups are summarised as follows:

In this study 1/3 of the knee MRI was normal and there was only 26% of total agreement between the clinical and MRI findings. Further more in 50% of cases that underwent arthroscopy, there was no correlation of arthroscopic and MRI findings. This study supports the view that knee MRI investigation in children may not provide a reliable diagnosis and guidance in children with knee pathology.