header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 43 - 43
1 Oct 2020
Griffin WL Li K Cuadra M Otero J Springer B
Full Access

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The common treatment in the US is a two-stage exchange which can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze complications in the treatment course of patients undergoing two-stage exchange for PJI THA and determine when they occur.

Methods

We analyzed all patients that underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of PJI after THA from January 2005 – December 2017 at a single institution. Complications were categorized as medical or surgical, divided into three intervals: (1) inter-stage, (2) early post-reimplantation (<90 days) and (3) late post-reimplantation (> 90 days). Minimum follow up was one year. Success was based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 36 - 36
1 Oct 2018
Fehring TK Fehring K Curtin B Springer B
Full Access

Introduction

Studies are being done comparing 1-stage vs. 2-stage protocols for PJI. 1-stage protocols take an extended period of time requiring 2 separate preps and sets of instruments in order to ensure optimal sterility. While intraoperative service time is one part of the reimbursement algorithm, reimbursement has lagged behind for single stage treatment. If 1-stage results are acceptable, but not reimbursed appropriately, surgeons may be discouraged from managing PJI in a 1-stage fashion. We ask, “What is the reimbursement and intraoperative service time for 1-stage procedures compared to primary surgery?”

Methods

Relative Value Unit's (RVU's), reimbursement and operative time for 50 PJI procedures were reviewed and compared to 250 primary (1°) THA and 250 primary (1°) TKA by four surgeons. Coding was done per AAOS guidelines.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 22 - 22
1 Oct 2018
Springer B Huddleston J Odum S Froemke C Sariolghalam S Fleming K Sypher K Duwelius PJ
Full Access

Introduction

Bundle payment models have clinical and economic impacts on providers. Despite efforts made to improve care, experience has shown that a few episodes with costs well above a target (bundle busters) can reduce or negate positive performances. The purpose of this study was to identify both the primary episode drivers of cost and patient factors that led to episodes above target.

Methods

A retrospective study of 10,000 joint replacement episodes from a large healthcare system in CJR and a private orthopedic practice in BPCI was conducted. Episodes with costs greater than target price (TP) were designated as bundle busters and sub-divided into 4 groups:

< 1 standard deviation (SD) above TP (n=1700)

> 1 to 2 SD above TP (n=240)

> 2 to 3 SD above TP (n=70)

> 3 SD above TP (n=70)

Bundle busters were compared to the control that were at/below the TP (n= 7500). For the CJR/BPCI cohorts, one SD was defined as $10,700/$13,000, respectively.

Two linear regressions assessed the likelihood of factors predicting a bundle buster and the total episode cost. These variables included demographics, acuity classifications, comorbidities, length of stay, readmissions, discharge disposition, post-acute utilization, and episode costs.