The goals of total knee arthroplasty are to restore the mechanical axis of the knee and create equal and symmetric tension on the ligaments throughout an arc of motion. What surgical technique best achieves this goal remains controversial.

In gap balancing, the extension space is created (distal femur and proximal tibia) and balanced. The flexion space and femoral component rotation are then set by placing tension on the collateral ligaments. This allows the femoral component to be rotated to create an equal and symmetric flexion gap based on the tension of collateral ligaments rather than arbitrary bony landmarks. In the measured resection technique, fixed bony landmarks are utilised to set femoral component rotation. Bony landmarks are subject to variations in patient's anatomy and inconsistency of the surgeon to reliably and reproducibly locate them during surgery. Fehring et al. demonstrated that 49% of knees using bony landmarks had rotational errors of greater than 3 degrees. A recent study determined that the amount of femoral component rotation necessary to create a balanced flexion gap varied based on the amount of ligament release required, calling into question the validity of using this technique to set femoral component rotation. Additionally, a study by Dennis et al. showed that setting femoral component rotation based solely on bony landmarks leads to asymmetry in the flexion gap and excessive condylar lift-off in flexion in over 60% of knees performed with a measured resection technique.

Periprosthetic fractures around the femur during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a common mode of failure. It is important therefore to recognise those factors that place patients at increased risk for development of this complication. Prevention of this complication, always trumps treatment. Risk factors can be stratified into: 1. Patient related factors; 2. Host bone and anatomical considerations; 3. Procedural related factors; and 4. Implant related factors.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It remains, unfortunately, one of the most common modes of failure in TKA. Much attention has been paid to the treatment of PJI once it occurs. Our attention, however, should focus on how to reduce the risk of PJI from developing in the first place. Infection prevention should focus on reducing modifiable risk factors that place patients at increasing risk for developing PJI. These areas include pre-operative patient optimization and intra-operative measures to reduce risk.

Pre-operative Modifiable Risk Factors: There are several patient related factors that have been shown to increase patient's risk of developing PJI. Many of these are modifiable risk factors can and should be optimised prior to surgery. Obesity and in particular Morbid Obesity (BMI >40) has a strong association with increased risk of PJI. Appropriate and healthy weight loss strategies should be instituted prior to elective TKA. Uncontrolled Diabetes (Hgb A1C >8) and poor glycemic control around the time of surgery increases the risk for complications, especially PJI. Malnutrition should be screened for in at-risk patients. Low Albumin levels are a risk factor for PJI and should be corrected. Patients should be required to stop smoking 6 weeks prior to surgery to lower risk. Low Vitamin D levels have been show to increase risk of PJI. Reduction of colonization of patient's nares with methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and resistant (MRSA) staphylococcus should be addressed with a screen and treat program.

Intra-operative Measures to Reduce PJI: During surgery, several steps should be taken to reduce risk of infection. Appropriate dosing and timing of antibiotics is critical and a first generation cephalosporin remains the antibiotic of choice. The use of antibiotic cement remains controversial with regards to its PJI prophylactic effectiveness. The utilization of a dilute betadine lavage has demonstrated decreased rate of PJI. Maintaining normothermia is critical to improve the body's ability to fight infection. An alcohol-based skin preparation can reduce skin flora as a cause of PJI. Appropriate selection of skin incisions and soft tissue handling can reduce wound healing problems and reduce development of PJI. Likewise, the use of occlusive dressing has been shown to promote wound healing and reduce PJI rates.

Acetabular fractures, particularly in the geriatric population are on the rise. A recent study indicated a 2.4-fold increase in the incidence of acetabular fractures, with the fastest rising age group, those older than the age of 55. Controversy exists as to the role and indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in the acute setting. Three common scenarios require further evaluation and will be addressed. 1.) What is the role of THA in the acute setting for young patients (< 55 years old)? 2.) What is the role and indications for THA in the older patient population (>55 years) and what are surgical tips to address these complex issues? 3.) What are the outcomes of THA in patients with prior acetabular fractures converted to THA?

Acetabular fractures in young patients are often the result of high energy trauma and are a life changing event. In general, preservation of the native hip joint and avoidance of arthroplasty as the first line treatment should be recommended. A recent long-term outcome study of 810 acetabular fractures treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) demonstrated 79% survivorship at 20 years with need for conversion to THA as the endpoint. Risk factors for failure were older age, degree of initial fracture displacement, incongruence of the acetabular roof and femoral head cartilage lesions. In selected younger patients, certain fracture types with concomitant injuries to articular surfaces may best be treated by acute THA.

In the elderly patient population, acetabular fractures are more likely the result of low energy trauma but often times result in more displacement, comminution and damage to the articular surface. Osteoporosis and generalised poor bone quality make adequate reduction and fixation a challenge in these acute injuries. As such, the role of acute arthroplasty is becoming more widespread. Consideration should be given to delayed arthroplasty in certain patients to allow time for fracture healing followed by THA. However, early mobilization and weight bearing is important in the elderly population and consideration should be given to acute THA. The challenge remains gaining appropriate acetabular fixation in the fractured, osteoporotic bone. Early results showed high complication rates with acetabular fixation. However, newer fixation surfaces and advances in ORIF techniques have led to improved results. In addition, the need for complex acetabular reconstruction with the use of cages or cup cage constructs may be required in this setting. Appropriate 3-D imaging is essential to evaluate the extent of involvement of the anterior and posterior columns as well as the acetabular walls. Mears et al. reported on 57 patients who underwent THA for acute acetabular fracture and reported results at a mean of 8.1 years. 79% of patient reported good or excellent results and no acetabular cups were revised for loosening.

One of the more common scenarios is the patient that presents with a prior ORIF of an acetabular fracture that has developed post-traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis of the hip and requires conversion to THA. Challenges in this patient population include dealing with prior hardware that may interfere with THA component fixation, severe stiffness of the joint making exposure difficult and prior heterotopic ossification that may put neurovascular structures at risk. Previous studies have demonstrated lower long-term survivorship of the acetabular component (71% at 20 years) compared to primary THA for osteoarthritis. New acetabular fixation surfaces should mitigate the risk of aseptic loosening in this challenging patient population.

There are numerous examples in medicine where “eminence trumps evidence.” The direct anterior approach (DA) is no exception. Its meteoric rise has largely been driven by industry and surgeon promotion. This surgical approach continues to garner interest, but this interest is largely for marketing purposes, as emerging data would suggest a high risk, low reward operation. In addition, factors such as selection bias and impact bias, have substantially swayed peoples interest into making an inferior operation look better.

There are several factors related to the direct anterior approach that should give us pause. Those include the surgeon learning curve, limited functional benefit and increased complications. There is no question the DA approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a long and steep learning curve. The majority of studies would suggest at minimum, 50–100 cases before a surgeon is comfortable with this approach and some studies would suggest the technical difficulties of this approach remain an issue even with increasing experience. This proves difficult with an attempted rapid adoption of this technique by a surgeon who may perform less than 50 THAs per year but feel the need to offer this approach to their patients for marketing purposes.

One of the many touted benefits of the DA approach is the perception of improved functional outcomes. Many of the early studies showed early improvement in gait, pain and mobility. However, these studies compared the DA approach to an anterolateral approach. Even when compared to the anterolateral approach, considered the most invasive and least muscle sparing, the benefits of the DA approach were only short term (6 weeks). The majority of retrospective studies, prospective randomised studies and meta-analyses comparing DA to a posterior approach show little, if any, benefit of one approach over another with regards to functional benefit. Another touted benefit includes a low or no dislocation risk associated with the posterior approach. On the contrary many studies have failed to demonstrate lower dislocation rates with the DA approach compared to a contemporary posterior approach. A recent registry study from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Initiative (MARQI) showed equal dislocation rates between the DA and posterior approach.

Concerns have also been raised regarding unique and more frequent complications with the DA approach compared to other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Unique complications such as ankle fractures and a high incidence of nerve injury, especially damage to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, have been reported. In addition, the data now clearly show a higher incidence of complications on the femoral side, including early loosening and periprosthetic fracture.

As responsible surgeons, if we want to say the DA approach is different, then fine, we can say it's different. Claims of superiority of one approach over another have not been born our in the literature and in fact much of the data would suggest a high risk no reward operation for the DA approach compared to other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty.

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is marketed with claims of superiority over other approaches. Femoral exposure can be technically challenging and potentially lead to early failure. We examined whether surgical approach is associated with early THA failure.

Introduction

Previous registry studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) have focused on revision outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the effect of ceramic bearings on infection, dislocation, and mortality as outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the Medicare population. We asked (1) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (2) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with M-PE?

Introduction

Previous studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) hip bearings have focused on outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the utilization or outcomes of ceramic bearings in revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) for the Medicare population in the US. We asked (1) what is the utilization of ceramic bearings for R-THA in the Medicare population and how has it evolved over time; (2) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (3) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with M-PE?

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis remains one of the most important strategies for prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with current guideline recommending a first or second generation cephalosporin. Penicillin (PCN) allergy is often reported by patients, which often results in avoidance of administration of cephalosporins due to fear of cross-reactivity. Alternative medications, such as vancomyin, are often used despite reduced antimicrobial coverage. The purpose of this study was to determine if PCN allergic patients who received vancomycin alone prior to elective primary total joint arthroplasty were at increased risk of developing a subsequent PJI.

A retrospective review of 7,602 primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed between 2005 and 2013 in two institutions were identified using a prospective institutional database. Patient reported PCN or cephalosporin allergy was electronically queried from the anesthesia note. Patients who recieved multiple prophylactic antibiotics, or had unavailable perioperative antibiotic information, or those who received medication other than cefazolin and vancomycin were excluded. PJI was determined using a cross-match with an institutional PJI database constructed from International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to evaluate the risk of subsequent PJI.

The rate of PJI was 1.4% (32/2296) in patients with a reported PCN allergy that received vancomycin alone versus 1.1% (59/5306) in non-PCN allergic patients that received cefazolin alone. The multivariate analysis, with the given sample size, did not detect a statistically significant increased risk of PJI when vancomycin was administered alone (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% CI 0.6–3.1, p=0.35). While there was no significant differences in the organism profile between PJIs in both groups, the rate of PJI caused by resistant organisms was higher in patients who received vancomycin alone (11.9%, 7/59) compared to those who received cefazolin (3.1%, 1/32).

While administration of perioperative prophylactic vancomycin alone during elective primary arthroplasty does not seem to result in a higher rate of subsequent PJI, patients who received vancomycin alone and developed a PJI were more likely to develop an infection with an antibiotic resistant organism. Future studies are needed to determine the most appropriate prophylactic antibiotic for patients who undergo elective arthroplasty and report PCN allergy.

Surgical exposure during revision total knee arthroplasty is the most essential part of the procedure. An appropriate surgical exposure protects the extensor mechanism, facilitates safe implant removal and allows for accurate reimplantation of components and appropriate soft tissue balancing. The pre-operative plan is critical to achieving appropriate exposure in the revision setting. Evaluating the skin and previous incisions and determining range of motion will aid in deciding which exposure technique is most appropriate.

The key to exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty is patience. Approximately 90% of revision total knees can be adequately exposed with a standard medial parapatellar arthrotomy, a proximal medial tibial exposure, complete synovectomy and clearing of the medial and lateral gutters. The patella need not be everted in the revision setting and extreme care must be taken to protect the extensor mechanism. In cases where standard exposure techniques are inadequate or may jeopardise the extensor mechanism, a quadriceps snip may be performed. This takes tension off the stiff knee, is easy to repair and does not require limitation of rehabilitation protocols. The tibial tubercle osteotomy is utilised in patients with extreme stiffness and to aid in removal of well-fixed tibial components. General principles include keeping the osteotomy fragment long (8–10 cm) and leaving a lateral periosteal bridge and soft tissue attachment to aid in repair and healing of the fragment. Other techniques such as the quadricepsplasty or V-Y turndown may be utilised but are rarely needed.

The goals of total knee arthroplasty are to restore the mechanical axis of the knee and create equal and symmetric tension on the ligaments throughout an arc of motion. What surgical technique best achieves this goal remains controversial.

In gap balancing, the extension space is created (distal femur and proximal tibia) and balanced. The flexion space and femoral component rotation are then set by placing tension on the collateral ligaments. This allows the femoral component to be rotated to create an equal and symmetric flexion gap based on the tension of collateral ligaments rather than arbitrary bony landmarks. In the measured resection technique, fixed bony landmarks are utilised to set femoral component rotation. Bony landmarks are subject to variations in patient's anatomy and inconsistency of the surgeon to reliably and reproducibly locate them during surgery. Fehring et al demonstrated that 49% of knees using bony landmarks had rotational errors of greater than 3 degrees. A recent study determined that the amount of femoral component rotation necessary to create a balanced flexion gap varied based on the amount of ligament release required, calling into question the validity of using this technique to set femoral component rotation. Additionally, a study by Dennis et al, showed that setting femoral component rotation based solely on bony landmarks leads to asymmetry in the flexion gap and excessive condylar lift off in flexion in over 60% of knees performed with a measured resection technique.