Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Mar 2017
Speranza A Alonzo R De Santis S Frontini S D'arrigo C Ferretti A
Full Access

Femoral neck fractures are the second cause of hospitalization in elderly patients. Nowadays it is still not clear whether surgical treatment may provide better clinical outcome than conservative treatment in patients affected by mental disorders, such as senile dementia.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess mortality and clinical and functional outcome after hemi arthroplasty operation following intracapsular neck fractures in patients with senile dementia.

Between 2008 and 2014, 819 patients were treated at our Orthopaedic Institute for neck fracture of the femur (mean age: 83.8 years old). Eighty-four of these showed clear signs of cognitive impairment at time of admission in the Emergency Department. Mental state of patients was assessed in all cases, as routine, at the Emergency Room with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (Sh-MMT) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Patients were divided in two groups depending whether they were surgically treated with hemiarthroplasty (Group B, 46 patients; 35 females, 11 males; mean age: 88.5 y.o.) or conservatively treated (Group C, 38 patients; 28 females, 10 males; mean age: 79.5 y.o.).

These two groups were compared with a matched case-control group of patients surgically treated with no mental disorders (Group A, 40 patients; 34 females, 6 males; mean age: 81.5 y.o.)

Incidence of mortality, systemic or local complications and functional clinical outcomes were evaluated with the ADL score and the Barthel index.

Mortality rate was 35% (14 patients) for Group A, 50% (21 patients) for Group B and 95% (22 patients) for Group C. Paired t-test, with significance rate set at 0.05, showed significant higher mortality rate in Group A compared to both Group B (p:0.02) and Group C (p:0.001), and also between Group B and Group C (p:0.01). Three orthopaedic complications were found in Group B (two cases of infection and one dislocation of the prosthesis) while none in Group A (p<0.001). There have been 14 overall general complication in Group A (33%), 16 in group B (38%) and 15 in Group C (65%), with significant higher rate in Group B vs. Group A (p:0.02) and in group C vs. Group B (p: 0.001)

Activity daily living scale and Barthel Index results showed higher results in Group B than Group C both in terms of recovery of walking ability and daily living (hairdressing, wearing clothes, eating).

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 222 - 222
1 Jun 2012
Speranza A Maestri B Monaco E D'arrigo C Ferretti A
Full Access

Manual postoperative CT calculation of anteversion and inclination of the acetabular cup can be inaccurate and depends on the observer's experience. The aim of this study is to describe and present a validation of a new CT-image-based dedicate software (EGIT) for calculation of the acetabular component placement.

The software principle is based on a three-dimensional reconstruction of a patient's bones from anatomical data collected postoperatively on the patient's CT scan.

15 Patient to be operated for THR were enrolled in this study. All patients were evaluated with post operative CT-scan. Measurement of Cup positioning were performed with two different methods: a manual method, performed by an expert radiologist, and a software CT image based method. Statistical analysis was performed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficent to asses interobserver and intraobserver reliability. A paired T-test was used to detect differences between manual and software methods.

The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was excellent for both the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. As expected the ICC is higher in the interobserver case.

A mean cup anteversion of 14.2 (S.D. ±6.9), mean inclination of 44.2 (S.D.± 5.8) are detected with EGIT by the expert surgeon; Mean Cup anteversion of 13.6 (S.D. ± 5.11), mean inclination of 43.3 (S.D.± 5.1) are detected with manual method by expert radiologist. No statistical difference have been found (P> 0.05).

The EGIT software seems to be an easy, accurate and reproducible method to calculate acetabular cup positioning using standard post-operative CT scan in THA.