Our goal is to assess diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid testing in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). In addition to differential leukocyte count, simples and inexpensive biomarkers such as synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and alpha-2-macrogloblulin(A2M) were also investigated and its possible role in increasing accuracy assessed. Between January/2013 and December/2019 total hip or knee arthroplasty revision cases (regardless of preoperative diagnosis) were prospectively included provided enough synovial fluid for biomarker analysis was collected and at least four tissue samples, as well as the implant for sonication, were gathered for microbiological study. Definitive diagnosis was classified according to the new EBJIS PJI definition. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined cutoff values as well as diagnostic accuracy for each marker.Aim
Method
There have been many attempts to define the criteria by which prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is diagnosed. Our aim is to validate the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions between 2013–2018. Cases with less than four intraoperative microbiology samples; no preoperative/intraoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count or intraoperative histology were excluded. Minimum follow-up of at least two years after revision surgery if no subsequent infection and/or the need for implant removal was also required. All cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions.Aim
Method
Synovial fluid investigation is the best alternative to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before adequate microbiological/histology sampling during revision surgery. Although accurate preoperative diagnosis is certainly recommended, puncturing every patient before revision arthroplasty raises concerns about safety and feasibility issues especially in difficult to access joint (e.g., hip), that often require OR time and fluoroscopy/ultrasound guidance. Currently there is no clear guidelines regarding optimal indications to perform preoperative joint aspiration to diagnose PJI before revision surgery. The main goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of our institutional criteria using the new European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI definition. We retrospectively evaluated every single- or first-stage for presumed aseptic or known infected revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedures between 2013–2020. Preoperative clinical and laboratory features were systematically scrutinized. Cases with insufficient information for accurate final PJI diagnosis (i.e., no perioperative synovial fluid examination or no multiple cultures including sonication of removed implant) were excluded. Preoperative joint aspiration is recommended in our institution if any of the following criteria are met: 1) elevated CRP and/or ESR; 2) early failure (<2 years) or repeat failure; 3) high clinical suspicion/risk factors are present. Performance of such criteria were compared against final postoperative EBJIS definition PJI diagnosis.Aim
Method
Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of three PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions. For this specific study, cases with no preoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count and less than four intraoperative microbiology samples were excluded. Cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and microbiology results.Aim
Method
Rifampin is considered as the antibiotic corner stone in the treatment of acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, if, when, and how to use rifampin has been questioned. We evaluated the outcome of patients treated with and without rifampin, and analysed the influence of timing, dose and co-antibiotic. Acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement between 1999 and 2017, and a minimal follow-up of 1 year were evaluated. Treatment failure was defined as the need for any further surgical procedure related to infection, PJI-related death, or the need for suppressive antimicrobial treatment.Aim
Method
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult. All current diagnostic tests have problems with accuracy and interpretation of results. Many new tests have been proposed, but there is no consensus on the place of many of these in the diagnostic pathway. Previous attempts to develop a definition of PJI have not been universally accepted and there remains no reference standard definition. This paper reports the outcome of a project developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and supported by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Implant-Associated Infections (ESGIAI). It comprised a comprehensive review of the literature, open discussion with Society members and conference delegates, and an expert panel assessment of the results to produce the final guidance.Aims
Methods
Failure of irrigation and debridement (I&D) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is influenced by numerous host, surgical, and pathogen-related factors. We aimed to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use tool based on machine learning that may accurately predict outcome following I&D surgery taking into account the influence of numerous factors. This was an international, multicentre retrospective study of 1,174 revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) undergoing I&D for PJI between January 2005 and December 2017. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. A total of 52 variables including demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and laboratory findings were evaluated using random forest machine learning analysis. The algorithm was then verified through cross-validation.Aims
Methods
C-reactive protein(CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) are non-specific markers with variable reported accuracy in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection(PJI). They are often used as a part of the initial diagnostics as they are widely available and inexpensive. Given its high false-negative rate, CRP is an insufficient screening tool for PJI especially in low virulence microorganisms. Nevertheless, many advocate ESR offers no added advantage and is useless in this setting. Our goal is to determine if the combined measurement of ESR and CRP offers increased sensitivity for the preliminary screening of PJI over isolated CRP measurement. We retrospectively evaluated every single- or first-stage for presumed aseptic or known infected revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedures between 2013–2018. Cases without preoperative CRP and ESR measurement as well those without synovial fluid for differential leukocyte count and/or no multiple cultures including sonication of removed implant obtained during surgery were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against two different PJI definitions: 2013 International Consensus Meeting and ProImplant Foundation definitions.Aim
Method
Treatment of complicated wound healing after total joint arthroplasty is controversial. What exactly constitutes prolonged wound drainage is matter of debate and recommendations to manage it vary considerably. Nonoperative measures are often recommended. If drainage persists, surgery may be indicated. To further intricate decision-making, differentiating superficial from deep surgical site infection is also controversial and inherently complex. Specific cutoffs for synovial fluid leukocyte count and blood C-reactive protein (CRP) in the acute stage have been suggested as a way to superficial infection requiring superficial wound washout from deep infection requiring a formal debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure. The goal of this study is to analyze clinical and laboratory findings of an institutional protocol of “aggressively” proceeding with formal DAIR in all patients with complicated wound healing Our indications for DAIR in suspected acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are: 1)prolonged wound drainage and CRP upward trend after day-3; 2)persistent wound drainage by day-10 regardless of CRP; 3)wound healing disturbance (e.g. “superficial” infection, “superficial” skin necrosis) anytime in early postoperative weeks. We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing DAIR in the first 60 postoperative days between 2014–2018. Patients without multiple deep tissue cultures obtained intraoperative were excluded. Deep infection was defined by at least two positive deep tissue cultures or one positive deep culture and positive leukocyte count (>10,000 cells/mL or >90% PMN).Aim
Method
Treatment success of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is largely dependent on the presence or absence of a mature biofilm. In what time interval a mature biofilm develops is still unclear, and therefore, the time point at which DAIR should be disrecommended remains to be established. This large multicenter trial evaluated the failure rates of DAIR for different time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR in early PJI. We retrospectively evaluated patients with early PJI treated with DAIR between 1996 and 2016. Early PJI was defined as a PJI that developed within 90 days after index arthroplasty. Patients with hematogenous infections, arthroscopic debridements and a follow-up less than one year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as 1) any further surgical procedure related to infection 2) PJI-related death, or 3) long-term suppressive antibiotics, all within one year after DAIR.Aim
Method
Antibiotic loaded spacers are often used during a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) both for its mechanical properties and as a means for local antibiotic delivery. The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation with the use of different antibiotic loaded spacers: aminoglycoside only vs. combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside vs. combined glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside. We retrospectively evaluated every two-stage exchange procedures for infected hip/knee arthroplasty between 2012–2018. Microbiological findings in the first and second stage were registered as well as the type of spacer and antibiotic(s) used. Cases in whom no cultures were obtained during reimplantation and cases without sufficient data on antibiotic(s) used in cement spacers were excluded.Aim
Method
Autologous-labeled leukocytes combined with sulfur colloid bone marrow scan is the current imaging modality of choice for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Although this technique is reliable, A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 53 patients with painful hip or knee prostheses that underwent 99mTc-sulesomab and 99mTc-nanocolloids sequentially, between January 2008 and December 2016. The combined images were interpreted as positive for infection when there was activity on the sulesomab scan without corresponding activity on the bone marrow scan. The final diagnosis was made with microbiological findings or by clinical follow up of at least 12 months.Aim
Materials and methods
The aims of this study were to increase the diagnostic accuracy
of the analysis of synovial fluid in the differentiation of prosthetic
joint infection (PJI) by the addition of inexpensive biomarkers
such as the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase
(ADA), alpha-2-macrogloblulin (α2M) and procalcitonin. Between January 2013 and December 2015, synovial fluid and removed
implants were requested from 143 revision total joint arthroplasties.
A total of 55 patients met inclusion criteria of the receipt of
sufficient synovial fluid, tissue samples and removed implants for
analysis. The diagnosis of PJI followed the definition from a recent International
Consensus Meeting to create two groups of patients; septic and aseptic.
Using receiver operating characteristic curves we determined the
cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy for each marker.Aims
Patients and Methods
Diagnosing prosthetic joint infections(PJI) is sometimes difficult. Being able to identify the bacteria involved in intraoperative samples is an essential diagnostic criterion. There are however some cases in which the traditional cultures are not capable of providing a definitive diagnosis. In this regard, implant sonication has emerged as a complementary test. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of microbiological studies obtained with and without implants sonication, in order to understand its real contribution to diagnosis. We retrospectively evaluated all cases of infected total hip or knee arthroplasty surgically treated between January 2009 and December 2013. The definition of infection met the criteria set out recently in the international consensus meeting. The number and type of bacteria identified in each patient and the type of microbiological study made were registered. Two different groups were created, with and without sonication, and the results were compared.Aim
Method
Our goal is to increase diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid testing in differentiating prosthetic joint infection(PJI) by more exhaustively studying simple and inexpensive biomarkers. For that purpose, we sought to determine: 1) if synovial fluid C-reactive protein(CRP), alpha-2-macrogloblulin(A2M), procalcitonin and adenosine deaminase(ADA) concentrations are different between infected and aseptic cases; 2) performance and optimal cutoff values of each marker; 3) whether any such test may help improve diagnostic performance of traditional leukocyte count. Between January/2013 and December/2015 total hip or knee arthroplasty revision cases (regardless of preoperative diagnosis) were prospectively included provided enough synovial fluid for biomarker analysis was collected and at least four tissue samples as well as the implant for sonication were gathered for microbiological study. Definitive diagnosis was classified as infection or aseptic on the basis of the recent International Consensus Meeting definition of PJI. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined cutoff values as well as sensitivity and specificity for each marker.Aim
Method
The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of inflammatory parameters normalization and/or increased time between stages necessary in predicting healing and preventing infection recurrence. We retrospectively studied all cases of total hip and knee arthroplasty that underwent revision for infection in our institution between 2011 and 2014. We revised the clinical and laboratory information from 55 patients (27 hips: 28 knees) with a mean age of 68 years. The average values before the first stage were 88.6 mm/h (15–134) and 59.1 mg/L (2–279) for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) and C-reactive protein(CRP) serum respectively. In 10 cases (18.2%) it was not possible to perform the second stage. Moreover, in the other 45 cases of re- arthroplasty, the mean follow-up was 32 months (1 year).Aim
Method
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and impact on functional results of surgical debridement performed in the early postoperative by comparing them with patients that undergone uncomplicated total joint arthroplasty. This is a retrospective case-control study. Patients that underwent debridement with prosthesis preservation for suspected acute postoperative infection of total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2010–2014 were included. Controls were randomly selected (1:2 ratio) from a list of primary arthroplasty patients in the same time period matching for articulation, age, gender, ASA score, BMI and follow-up time. Infection status, success of treatment and medical-surgical complications were investigated and all patients were assessed using Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS).Aim
Method
Sepsis following total knee replacement (TKR) is a disastrous complication. The knee arthrodesis comes as the final solution to solve the chronic infection after multiple failed surgeries. Our objective was to review these procedures performed in our institution for the past 20 years. We present a retrospective study with 5 cases of severe unsolved knee infection after TKR, who have been finally submitted to knee arthrodesis performed between 1993 and 2008. The patients are 4 males and 1 female, with a mean age of 62 years (ranging from 55 to 74 years) at the time of surgery. They presented MRSA infection (3 cases), P aeruginosa infection (1 case) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1 case). The average follow up was 25 months (between 12–48 months). The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) value was registered. The mean number of surgeries before the arthrodesis was 3,6. In 4 of the 5 cases the surgeon used an external fixator to achieve the fusion. In the other patient, an intramedullary nail was used. The arthrodesis was performed in a single-time surgery in every patient. All cases achieved knee fusion and the mean time of consolidation was 5,1 months, with the longest being 8 months until fusion. No bone graft was used in any of these cases, and the mean size of leg length discrepancy was 2,8 cm. The average VAS was 3,6. In one patient with an external fixator there was a relapse of the infection (MRSA infection), but with adequate antibiotic therapy (vancomycin) ended up to resolve. There are no records of any other complication. The knee arthrodesis appears as last but useful resort in extreme cases of relapse infection after a TKR and multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Although it comprises an elevated level of morbidity, it also seems to allow to heal difficult and multi resistant infections and with few complications.
Primary tuberculous bursitis was a relatively frequent manifestation of the disease before the antituberculosis drug era. Nowadays, it is considered a rare condition; it accounts for 1–2% of all musculoskeletal tuberculosis. The diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous bursitis may be delayed because the paucity of symptoms, its indolent clinical course and a low clinical suspicion. A 50-year-old patient with tuberculous trochanteric bursitis is reported. A 50-year-old woman was referred to our department to investigate a persistent pain in her left hip with 6 months duration. She was afebrile. The examination revealed a diffuse swelling from the buttock through the thigh, notable over the trochanter, but no sign of acute inflammation such as heat and redness. Her past medical and family histories revealed no previous tuberculosis. Plain films of the left hip showed a partial destruction of the margin of the greater trochanter, lytic foci in the underlying bone and a small focus of calcification in the adjacent soft tissues. A computed tomogram showed a soft tissue mass and demonstrated the relationship with the trochanter. We performed a needle biopsy which revealed granulomatous tissue. The patient underwent complete excision of the bursa and curettage of the surface of the trochanter. The postoperative course was uneventful. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated and definitive diagnosis of tuberculous bursitis was made. There was no evidence of concomitant tuberculosis at other musculoskeletal sites. The patient completed a treatment with rifampicin and etambutol for 6 months. There has been a complete resolution of the symptoms after 3 months and no recurrence after 4 years of follow-up. On plain radiograph the remodeling of the bone structure is clearly visible. Tuberculosis in the region of the greater trochanter is extremely rare. This rarity leads orthopedic surgeons to neglect this potential diagnosis, resulting in a delay in treatment. The pathogenesis of tuberculosis of the greater trochanteric area has not been well defined. The incidence of concomitant tuberculosis at other musculoskeletal sites, as well as the lung, is approximately 50%. Both hematogenous infection and propagation from other locations are reasonable explanations. Surgical intervention is mandatory for cure and the use of several antituberculosis agents is a standard approach.
