Methods

Between 1994 and 2012, fourty-two patients were revised with SROM® stems. Reasons for revision included aseptic loosening of the cup or stem (11), periprosthetic fracture (2), osteolysis (8), dislocation (13) and other reasons (7). One was revised for stem breakage, and this was excluded from this study. We examined 41 retrieved S-ROM® comprised of 6 metal-on-metal (MOM), 12 metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), 7 ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) and 16 ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). The orientation for all components was marked at the time of revision surgery. Both the proximal sleeve/stem and the femoral head-neck modular junctions were examined under 10X magnification, and graded by two independent observers. The head tapers were divided into 4 regions, and graded using a previously published 3 point scoring system for fretting and corrosion damage (Goldberg et al, Kop et al), for a total corrosion damage score of 12. The SROM stems were also assessed at the sleeve/stem taper junction. Each stem was divided into 8 quadrants, and graded for corrosion and fretting using the same system as the taper. In addition to severity, we also quantified area of corrosion damage of the stem at the sleeve-stem junction from 0–3, which was multiplied by the severity of damage, to give a score out of 9 for each quadrant (maximum total score of 72 for the stem). The bearing type was unknown to the investigators, so the grading was done in a blinded fashion. Corrosion scores were divided by time to account for differences in time to revision.