Progressive resistance training (PRT) as a mean to reduce symptoms in patients with hip dysplasia (HD) has not yet been tried out. The aim of this study was to examine if PRT is feasible in patients with HD. A secondary purpose was to report data on changes of patient reported outcomes, muscle performance and hip muscle strength following PRT. Patients diagnosed with HD on the waiting list for a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) were offered to participate in a PRT feasibility study. The PRT intervention consisted of 8-weeks of supervised PRT consisting of 20 training sessions with exercises for the hips and knees. Feasibility was evaluated as adherence, the number of dropouts and adverse events. Furthermore, pain was reported after each exercise and one day after a training session using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Pain was categorized as “safe” (VAS ≤20), “acceptable” (VAS >20–50) and “high risk” (VAS >50). Pre- and post the intervention patients completed the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), performed two hop-tests on each leg and had their peak torque of the hip extensors and flexors assessed by isokinetic dynamometry.Introduction
Materials and methods
Impaction allograft is an established method of securing initial stability of an implant in arthroplasty. Subsequent bone integration can be prolonged, and the volume of allograft may not be maintained. Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone has an anabolic effect on bone and may therefore improve integration of an implant. Using a canine implant model we tested the hypothesis that administration of parathyroid hormone may improve osseointegration of implants surrounded by bone graft. In 20 dogs a cylindrical porous-coated titanium alloy implant was inserted into normal cancellous bone in the proximal humerus and surrounded by a circumferential gap of 2.5 mm. Morsellised allograft was impacted around the implant. Half of the animals were given daily injections of human parathyroid hormone (1–34) 5 μg/kg for four weeks and half received control injections. The two groups were compared by mechanical testing and histomorphometry. We observed a significant increase in new bone formation within the bone graft in the parathyroid hormone group. There were no significant differences in the volume of allograft, bone-implant contact or in the mechanical parameters. These findings suggest that parathyroid hormone improves new bone formation in impacted morsellised allograft around an implant and retains the graft volume without significant resorption. Fixation of the implant was neither improved nor compromised at the final follow-up of four weeks.
