Earlier diagnosis is one of the key aims in achieving improved outcomes for patients with cancer. In general, the earlier a tumour is diagnosed, the easier it will be to treat and the greater the chance of cure. We have investigated how tumour size at diagnosis and duration of symptoms, both of which may act as a proxy for delay in diagnosis have varied over a 25 year period and whether there is evidence of improvement.

Data were available for 2568 patients with primary bone sarcomas and 2366 with soft tissue sarcomas. The mean size at diagnosis was 10.7 cm for bone tumours and 9.9cm for soft tissue sarcomas. The size of bone sarcomas had not changed with the passage of time but there had been a slight decrease in the size of soft tissue sarcomas (10.3 cm before 2000 vs 9.6cm after 2000, p=0.03). The duration of symptoms reported by patients varied widely with a median of 16 weeks for bone sarcomas and 26 weeks for soft tissue sarcomas. The median duration of symptoms for bone sarcomas had actually increased since 2000 (16 weeks before to 20 weeks after 2000, p⋋0.01), whilst it remained unchanged for soft tissue sarcomas. Further analysis showed that females tended to present with smaller tumours than males and that slower growing tumours (eg. liposarcoma and chondrosarcoma) tended to be larger and have a longer duration of symptoms than other tumours. 15% of patients with a soft tissue sarcoma had undergone a previous inadvertent excision – and this % has not changed over 20 years. Younger patients had smaller soft tissue soft tissue sarcomas than older patients but there was little difference for bone sarcomas.

Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas represent approximately 1% of all malignant tumours. Delays in diagnosis are frequent and the average size of Sarcomas at diagnosis has averaged 10cm for many years. In 1999 guidance was produced by NICE with the aim of leading to the earlier diagnosis of common cancers – including Sarcomas. We have attempted to analyze whether this guidance has had any impact on either the size of the tumours at diagnosis or the symptom duration prior to diagnosis experienced by the patients.

Data for patients referred to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham between 1992 and 2007 with Bone Sarcomas (n=1592) and Soft Tissue Sarcomas (n=2004) were analysed to determine the effect of the guidance. For Bone Sarcomas the mean size of the tumours decreased from 11.2cm prior to the guidance to 10.7cm after the guidance but the change was not statistically significant (p=0.09). The mean duration of symptoms increased from 18 to 21.2 weeks (p=0.01). For Soft Tissue Sarcomas, mean size fell from 10.8cm to 9.5cm (p<0.001), however the duration of symptoms actually increased from 27.3 to 32.1 weeks (p=0.01). Statistical modelling using restricted cubic splines confirmed these trends in the data.

These results show that whilst there may have been a slight improvement in the size at diagnosis of Soft Tissue Sarcomas, overall most patients still experience a long delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis and commencement of treatment. It is difficult to conclude that the early diagnosis guidance produced in 1999 has had a significant effect on the basis of this study. Strategies to improve awareness of the symptoms and clinical features of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas are still urgently required.

We have investigated the oncological outcome of 63 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the hand managed at three major centres in the United Kingdom. There were 44 males and 19 females with a mean age of 45 years (11 to 92). The three most common diagnoses were synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and epithelioid sarcoma. Local excision was carried out in 45 patients (71%) and amputation in 18 (29%). All those treated by amputation had a wide margin of excision but this was only achieved in 58% of those treated by local excision. The risk of local recurrence was 6% in those treated by amputation compared with 42% for those who underwent attempted limb salvage. An inadequate margin of excision resulted in a 12 times greater risk of local recurrence when compared with those in whom a wide margin of excision had been achieved. We were unable to demonstrate any role for radiotherapy in decreasing the risk of local recurrence when there was an inadequate margin of excision. Patients with an inadequate margin of excision had a much higher risk of both local recurrence and metastasis than those with wide margins. The overall survival rate at five years was 87% and was related to the grade and size of the tumour and to the surgical margin.

We have shown that a clear margin of excision is essential to achieve local control of a soft-tissue sarcoma in the hand and that failure to achieve this results in a high risk of both local recurrence and metastastic disease.

We reviewed retrospectively 236 consecutive patients seen in our soft-tissue sarcoma clinic. Of these, 95 had had a primary soft-tissue sarcoma excised elsewhere, but with histologically inadequate resection margins. All these patients had a secondary and wider re-excision.

The tissues removed at the secondary re-excision were examined histologically for the presence of residual tumour. Definite tumour tissue was found in 29 of 55 lower-limb specimens, 16 of 25 upper-limb, 7 of 10 trunk and 4 of 5 head and neck specimens. In 31 cases some residual tumour was visible macroscopically, and in 56 of the 95 patients (59%) the primary tumour had been incompletely excised.

Our results indicate that surgical assessment of the adequacy of excision is very inaccurate and that most local recurrences are the consequence of inadequate primary surgery. The large number of patients who had inadequate initial treatment emphasises the need for a co-ordinated multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.