There is a paucity of long-term studies analyzing risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the mid- to long-term septic and non-septic failure rate of single-stage revision for PJI after THA. We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Mean follow-up was seven years (1 to 14). Septic failure was diagnosed with a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any reoperation for mechanical causes in the absence of evidence of infection was considered as non-septic failure. A competing risk regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic and non-septic failures. A Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to analyze mortality.Aims
Methods
We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) treated with internal fixation with that of B1 PFFs treated with internal fixation and B2 fractures treated with revision arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 112 PFFs, of which 47 (42%) B1 and 27 (24%) B2 PFFs were treated with internal fixation, whereas 38 (34%) B2 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty. Decision to perform internal fixation for B2 PFFs was based on specific radiological (polished femoral components, intact bone-cement interface) and clinical criteria (low-demand patient). Median follow-up was 36.4 months (24 to 60). Implant survival and mortality over time were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (measured with a modified Dindo-Clavien classification) and 90-day readmissions were additionally compared between groups.Aims
Methods
We aimed to report the mid- to long-term rates of septic and aseptic failure after two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively reviewed 96 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. The mean follow-up was 90 months (SD 32). Septic failure was assessed using a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any further surgery undertaken for aseptic mechanical causes was considered as aseptic failure. The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict the risk of septic failure. A regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic failure. The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was also analyzed.Aims
Methods
Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration as well as permitting modularity. Monoblock ceramic acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup permitting the use of large femoral heads. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of both cups. This was a prospective RCT of 86 unilateral THA patients (M: 40, F: 48; mean age: 59.5 ± 10.6) randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (pore size 250µm, 45% mean volume porosity)(n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic(CoC) bearing (pore size 300µm, 48% mean volume porosity & 80nm HA coating thickness)(n=42). All sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Two-year radiographs and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were available.Introduction
Methods
The Corail stem has good long-term results. After four years
of using this stem, we have detected a small group of patients who
have presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. The aim of
this study was to quantify the incidence of this complication, to
delineate the characteristics of patients presenting with this complication
and to compare these patients with asymptomatic controls to determine
any important predisposing factors. Of 855 Corail collarless cementless stems implanted for osteoarthritis,
18 presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. A control group
of 74 randomly selected patients was assembled. Clinical and radiological
parameters were measured and a logistic regression model was created
to evaluate factors associated with metaphyseal debonding.Aims
Patients and Methods
