header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 245 - 245
1 May 2009
Murnaghan L Byrne A Mulpuri K Slobogean BL Tredwell SJ
Full Access

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are among the most common paediatric fractures, and yet present one of the greatest technical challenges for management. Traditionally treated as surgical urgencies, recent literature calls that belief into question. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the elapsed time from injury to surgery of Gartland Type III supracondylar fractures on operative time and quality of reduction.

A retrospective review of all Gartland Type III supra-condylar factures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning at our hospital between January 2003 and April 2006 was performed. Subjects in this consecutive series underwent a formal chart review to extract necessary data. The intra-operative fluroscopic images were utilised to assess the quality of reduction. All images were analyzed by three independent blinded reviewers on two separate occasions. Parameters measured on the AP images included: Baumann’s Angle, Humerocapitellar angle, Gordon Index, Griffet Index one and two.

Of the one hundred and forty-one charts reviewed, twenty-nine were excluded for various criteria. Of the remaining sample (N=112), sixty-one patients were treated in less than eight hours (Group one), and fifty-one treated after eighthours (Group two). There were sixty-one girls and fifty-one boys, with a mean age of six yrs. There were no cases of compartment syndrome. No subjects required conversion from closed to open reduction. The mean time from injury to surgery was six hundred and seventy minutes (min = 128, max = 3117). The mean for Group one was three hundred and forty-one minutes and one thousand and sixty-five minutes for Group two. The mean operative time was 33.29 minutes, (min=ten, max =eighty-two). The mean operative time in Group one was 33.13 minutes and 33.38 minutes in Group two. Two t-tailed t-test demonstrates no significant difference between the two groups. Radiographic analysis revealed the following means: Baumann’s angle (m = 70.26), humero-capitellar angle (m= 36.19), Gordon Index (m=33.78), Griffet Index 1 (m=0.88) and Griffet Index 2 (m=2.55). Comparison of the radiographic parameters and indices demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups.

This study demonstrates delaying surgery beyond eight hours led to no difference in operative time or quality of reduction. Previous studies have demonstrated no difference in rate of compartment syndrome, presence of complications or need for open reduction between these two groups. Our findings combined with previous retrospective studies support the need for further prospective study and support the surgeon’s clinical judgment in determining the urgency of surgical intervention in this patient population.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 245 - 245
1 May 2009
Dulai S Beauchamp R Mulpuri K Slobogean BL
Full Access

The promotion and practice of evidence-based medicine necessitates a critical evaluation of medical literature including the “gold standard” of randomised clinical trials. Recent studies have examined the quality of randomised clinical trials in various surgical specialties, but no study has focused on pediatric orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to assess and describe the quality of randomised clinical trials published in the last ten years in journals with high clinical impact in pediatric orthopaedics.

All of the randomised clinical trials in pediatric orthopedics published in five well-recognised journals between 1995–2005 were reviewed using the Detsky Quality Assessment Scale.

The mean percentage score on the Detsky Scale was 53% (95% CI: 46%–60%). Only seven (19%) of the articles satisfied the threshold for a satisfactory level of methodologic quality (Detsky > 75%).

The majority of randomised clinical trials in pediatric orthopedics that are published in well-recognised, peer-reviewed journals demonstrate substantial deficiencies in methodologic quality. Particular areas of weakness include inadequate rigor and reporting of randomization methods, use of inappropriate or poorly-described outcome measures, inadequate description of inclusion and exclusion criteria and inappropriate statistical analysis. Further efforts are necessary to improve the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in this field in order to avoid inadvertent misinformation of the clinical community.