Introduction: The study is aimed to present patient oriented diagnostics, treatment, remote rehabilitation potential and preliminary outcomes assessment in the group of osteoporotic compression fracture cases.
Methods: 3D postural assessment originally developed of spinal curvatures, semi quantitative radiographic evaluation and QCT BMD measurement were used in the study. The kyphosis angle based on back shape curve was measured on the 3D surface image utilizing dedicated software mimicking Debrunner kyphometer measurement. Radiographic assessment and measurements were performed on digital images using DICOM viewing analytic software (DICOM Vision, Alteris Ltd.). Radiographic assessment of VCF was based on semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment. Bone mineral density were measured utilizing DXA BMD (g/cm2) and QCT BMD (mg/cm3) of the lumbar spine. The polish translation of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a (http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/index.htm). Telerehabilitation service was served as a supplementary service utilizing Internet videoconferencing. Summary and nonparametric statistical analysis was performed.
Results: The group of elderly patients finally enrolled to the study consisted of patients whose data, images, and other examinations were analyzed. Average age of patients was 73,22 years. Average number of fractured vertebra was 3,6 in the study group. The most frequent anatomical location of fractures was lumbar first and third vertebral body. The most frequent fracture types according to Genant et al. classification were Biconcave Grade II (38,6%) and Wedge Grade II (36,9%). The most frequent 53-A1.2 and 53-A2.1 types of fractures. An average QCT bone density was lower than 80 mg/cm3 in whole examined group that represents severe osteoporosis. Bone density lower than 30 mg/cm3 was found in almost one third of the group that coincided with highest number of fractured vertebral bodies. Oswestry disability score was highest along with lowest values of QCT BMD, and significantly improved after vertebral augmentation. Telerehabilitation was considered as successful among computer skilled patients.
Discussion: and Conclusion: Described personalized approach shows the flow of the individual patient from Metabolic Bone Diseases and Osteoporosis Unit through diagnostics and surgery to telerehabilitation service opportunities. The 3D structural light method of posture was developed and implemented. Telerehabilitation service may activate patients at home. Complex personalized, team approach to osteoporotic vertebral fractures consisted of new diagnostics, vertebral augmentation and remote rehabilitation.
