This text has been removed at the authors' request.
Extensive bone loss and poor residual bone quality can make implant fixation difficult to achieve in revision of failed megaprostheses. While newer porous components are available to address various periarticular cavitary and segmental defects, diaphyseal fixation remains challenging without resorting to cemented techniques, or cementless fully-coated stems that achieve fixation over long segments of bone. In cases of previous infection, it may be advantageous to avoid the use of such devices as they can be difficult to remove and may result in even greater bone loss if the infection were to persist. Compressive osseointegration technology has been become a valuable device in the management of these challenging situations. We aimed to evaluate the short-term results of compressive osseointegration when used for reconstruction of massive diaphyseal and segmental bone defects. We believe that compressive osseointegration provides predictable, strong endoprosthesis fixation in the short-term and that osseointegration can be evaluated radiogrphically.Introduction
Objectives
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) arising in the adductor compartment of the thigh are frequently large before clinical detection, posing particular challenges with surgical resection and associated with a high risk of wound complications. This study compares oncological and functional outcomes and complications following treatment of adductor compartment soft tissue sarcomas from three international centres with different treatment philosophies. 184 patients with new primary, non-metastatic, deep STS in the adductor compartment diagnosed between 1990 and 2001 were identified from the centres' local databases. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was used to assess function in patients. There were 94 male and 90 female patients, with ages ranging from 13 to 88 years (median age 57 years). The period of follow-up ranged from 1 to 162 months. The overall survival was 65% at 5 years and related to grade and size of the tumour. There was no difference in overall survival or systemic relapse between the three centres. There was however a significant difference in local control (28% LR in centre 1 compared to 10% in centre 2 and 5% in centre 3, which appeared to be principally related to the use of radiotherapy and surgical margins.) 66 patients (36%) from the three centres developed wound complications post-operatively and it was shown to be associated with high grade and large tumours (>10cm). Functional scores averaged 78% but were significantly worse for patients with wound complications or high-grade tumours; however, they were not affected by timing of radiotherapy or use of prophylactic free muscle flaps. This large series of adductor compartment STS has shown that survival factors do not vary across international boundaries but that treatment factors affect complications, local recurrence and function. Centralisation of adjuvant treatment like radiotherapy may have an important role in improving local control.Conclusion