The introduction of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) into the operating theatre is often associated with a learning curve and is potentially associated with additional complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of robotic-assisted (RA) TKA within a multi-surgeon team. This prospective cohort study included 83 consecutive conventional jig-based TKAs compared with 53 RA TKAs using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) for knee osteoarthritis performed by three high-volume (> 100 TKA per year) orthopaedic surgeons. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, sex and pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence grade were well-matched between the conventional and RA TKA groups. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess learning curves for operative times for each surgeon. Peri-operative and delayed complications were reviewed. The CUSUM analysis for operative time demonstrated an inflexion point after 5, 6 and 15 cases for each of the three surgeons, or 8.7 cases on average. There were no significant differences (p = 0.53) in operative times between the RA TKA learning (before inflexion point) and proficiency (after inflexion point) phases. Similarly, the operative times of the RA TKA group did not differ significantly (p = 0.92) from the conventional TKA group. There was no discernible learning curve for the accuracy of component planning using the RA TKA system. The average length of post-operative follow-up was 21.3 ± 9.0 months. There was no significant difference (p > 0.99) in post-operative complication rates between the groups. The introduction of the RA TKA system was associated with a learning curve for operative time of 8.7 cases. Operative times between the RA TKA and conventional TKA group were similar. The short learning curve implies this RA TKA system can be adopted relatively quickly into a surgical team with minimal risks to patients.
Previous studies have suggested that the modular junction of metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) is an important source of metallic debris. We carried out a prospective study using custom techniques to analyse one of the largest collections of failed contemporary MoM devices in the world. All explants from patients who had suffered adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were included in this study. These explants included: 82 36mm THRs, and 147 resurfacing head THRs and 140 resurfacing arthroplasties from several manufactures. Volumetric wear analysis of the bearing surfaces and taper junctions was carried out using a coordinate measuring machine. The relationships between total metallic loss and metal ion concentrations and the macroscopic and histological tissue appearance of THR patients were compared to those in resurfacing patients. Mann Whitney test for non-parametric data was used to assess significant differences between groups.Background
Methods
We have previously described the relationship between wear rates of MOM components and soft tissue necrosis. In this study we investigated the link between wear rates, metal ion concentrations and osteolysis. All unilateral patients who underwent revision of hip resurfacings at our centre were included. Retrieved components were analysed using a coordinate measuring machine to determine total volumetric material loss and rates of wear. Given the accuracy of the wear calculations (which we have previously published), wear rates were considered “abnormal” if ≥3mm3/yr. ROC curves were constructed to determine a Co concentration which would be clinically useful to detect abnormal wear. During revision, the presence/absence of osteolysis was documented.Background
Methods
The failure and subsequent withdrawal of the ASR device in both its resurfacing and THR form has been well documented. The National Joint Registry report of 2010 quoted figures of 12–13% failure at five years. Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is a poorly understood condition and patients developing severe metal reactions may go unrecognised for sometime. In 2004 a single surgeons prospective study of the ASR bearing surface was undertaken. We present the ARMD failure rates of the ASR resurfacing and ASR THR systems. The diagnosis of ARMD was made by the senior author and was based on clinical history, examination, ultrasound findings, metal ion analysis of blood and joint fluid, operative findings and histopathological analysis of tissues retrieved at revision. Mean follow up was 52 months (24–81) and 70 patients were beyond 6 years of the procedure at the time of writing. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was carried out firstly with joints designated “failure” if the patient had undergone revision surgery or if the patient had been listed. A second survival analysis was carried out with a failure defined as a serum cobalt > 7µg/L. Full explant analysis was carried out for retrieved prostheses.Background
Patients and Methods
Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is an increasingly recognised complication of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. A previous study described poor results following revision and recommended early intervention1. We determined the outcome of revision for ARMD and present the largest case series to date. Between 2005 and 2010, 98 patients (101 hips) underwent revision for ARMD. The diagnosis of ARMD was based on clinical history, examination, appearance at revision and histology. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patient satisfaction, Harris hip scores (HHS) and metal ions were analysed.Introduction
Methods
We conducted independent wear analysis of retrieved metal on metal (MoM) hip components from around the world. All patients with resurfaced hips who developed adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were found to have increased wear of the bearing surfaces. This was untrue in patients with large diameter (?36mm) MoM total hip replacements. This led us to search for other factors leading to ARMD. MoM THR explants retrieved from 78 patients suffering ARMD underwent full volumetric wear analysis of bearing surface and taper-junctions using coordinate measuring machine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) used to characterise material composition of specific areas.Introduction
Methods
