Open tibial fractures typically occur as a consequence of high energy trauma in patients of working age resulting in high rates of deep infection and poor functional outcome. Whilst improved rates of limb salvage, avoidance of infection and better ultimate function have been attributed to improved centralisation of care in orthoplastic units, there remains no universally accepted method of definitive management of these injuries. The aim of this study is to the report the experience of a major trauma centre utilising circular frames as definitive fixation in patients sustaining Gustilo-Anderson (GA) 3B open fractures A prospectively maintained database was interrogated to identify all patients. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to collate patient demographics and injury factors . The primary outcome of interest was deep infection rate with secondary outcomes including time to union and secondary interventionsIntroduction
Materials & Methods
During its conception, Ilizarov advocated a fine wire tension of between 900N and 1200N for circular frame construction. Wire tension can be achieved via a tensioning device or ‘Russian tensioning’ (a fixed wire lengthening around a bolt). There is limited information on the latter technique. This study aimed to explore the tensions achieved via Russian tensioning and report the impact of a second wire on construct tension. A single 160mm stainless-steel ring was constructed, then 1.8mm stainless steel wires secured using a Russian fixation bolt and Russian tensioned with a 2nd bolt. The angle subtended by tensioning using the 2nd bolt was measured using a goniometer. Angles of 45°, 70° and 90° were repeated in triplicates, with wire tension measured using a calibrated tensiometer. A 2nd orthogonal wire was placed on the opposite side and tensioned to the same angle. Tensions of both wires were remeasured and recorded. Statistical comparison using unpaired t-tests was used to compare mean tensions. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Circular frame fixation has become a cornerstone of non-union and deformity management since its inception in the 1950s. As a consequence of modularity and heterogenous patient and injury factors, the prediction of the mechanobiological environment within a defect is subject to wide variations in practice. Given these wide range of confounding variables, clinical and cadaveric experimentation is close to impossible and frame constructs are based upon clinician experience. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method provides a powerful tool to numerically analyse mechanics. This work aims to develop an FEA model of a tibial defect and predict the mechanical response within the construct. The geometry of a tibia was acquired via CT and a series of bone defects were digitally created in the tibial diaphysis. A 4-ring, 10-wire Ilizarov fixator was constructed using 180mm stainless steel rings and 1.8mm stainless steel wires tensioned to 1200N. An axial load (800N) was applied to simulate single leg stance of an 80kg patient. The magnitude of displacement was measured for defects with varying sizes (5–40mm). A numerical analysis was performed in large-strain regime using open-source FEA library (MoFEM).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Recent NICE guidelines suggest that Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) be offered to all patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture who: are able to walk independently; not cognitively impaired and are medically fit for the anaesthesia and procedure. This is likely to have significant logistical implications for individual departments. Data from the National Hip Fracture Database was analysed retrospectively between January 2009 and November 2011. The aim was to determine if patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures admitted to a single tertiary referral orthopaedic trauma unit received a THA if they met NICE criteria. Case notes were then reviewed to obtain outcome and complication rates after surgery. Five hundred and forty-six patients were admitted with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture over the described time period. Sixty-five patients met the NICE criteria to receive a THA (mean age 74 years, M:F = 16: 49); however, 21 patients had a THA. The other patients received either a cemented Thompson or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Within the THA cohort there were no episodes of dislocation, venous thromboembolism, significant wound complications or infections that required further surgery. Within the hemiarthroplasty cohort there was 2 mortalities, 2 implant related infections, 1 dislocation and 2 required revision to a THA. There is evidence to suggest better outcomes in this cohort of patients, in terms pain and function. There is also a forecasted cost saving for departments, largely due to the relative reduction in complications. However, there were many cases (44) in our department, which would have been eligible for a THA, according to the NICE guidelines, who received a hemiarthroplasty. This is likely a reflection of the increased technical demand, and larger logistical difficulties faced by the department. We did note more complications within the hemiarthroplasty group, however, the numbers are too small to address statistical significance, and a longer follow up would be needed to further evaluate this. There is a clear scope for optimisation and improvement of infrastructure to develop time and resources to cope with the increased demand for THA for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures, in order to closely adhere to the NICE guidelines.
