Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 472 - 472
1 Aug 2008
Sharmah S Ramesh B Bastawrous SS Smith I
Full Access

There are many management solutions for the fixation of Periprosthetic fractures with intact stem of Hip and shoulder arthroplasties. The Bio Mechanics of single plate application are unlikely to be strong enough to commence mobilisation and its effectiveness against torsional strain with an osteoporotic bone quality is of concern. Double plate fixation as discussed at the last South African Orthopaedic Congress by Mr Floyd et al is another option but this again may have some biomechanical concerns and biological compromise at the fracture site due to periosteal stripping. Implant revision with a longer stem is a bigger surgical insult to a potentially frail group of patients with questionable bone quality. We report a short series of 16 peri-prosthetic fractures with intact stem that are managed with Zimmer cable plate fixation System. The results were very satisfactory and we consider this an attractive option to be considered in the management of this difficult presentation.

This is a retrospective study. We present the results of 13 Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft fractures and 3 humeral periprosthetic fractures in 16 patients treated with cable plate fixation system. Majority of the patients were over 60 years with an ASA rating of 3–4. The procedures were performed in a district general hospital in the UK between August 2001 to December 2005. The patients presented with in 1–20 years following initial Arthroplasty. All the fractures were fixed with Zimmer cable plate fixation system. An 8 hole plate was most commonly used for femoral fractures through the lateral approach for TYPE 2 fractures. The proximal end of the plate was secured with 3–4 cable ties. Early partial weight bearing was encouraged.

The majority of the patients were discharged within 12 weeks. Of the 3 humeral fractures union was achieved at 12 weeks in 2. There was 1 case of implant failure due to a further fracture noted in a manic depressive patient, who was not compliant. All proximal femoral fractures showed evidence of clinical and radiological union by 6 months. The majority (7/13) had united within 20 weeks. There were no complications noted. We recommend this effective method should seriously be considered in the management of this difficult and increasingly occurring complication in a frail population.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 472 - 473
1 Aug 2008
Hickerton B Roshan A Ramesh B Bastawrous S Smith I Sharmah S
Full Access

Proximal femoral fractures, whether it is due to meta-static destruction or periprosthetic fractures with loose femoral component with secondary osteolysis of the proximal femur in the elderly patient is a major task. We find the Cannulock hip system quite useful in tackling this issue. It offers various options for the management of this complex pathology.

We present the results of 11 Cannulock Hip Arthroplasty performed in 10 patients (Age Range 55–92). 6 out of 11 patients was noted to have metastatic destruction of proximal femur including the head and neck down to lesser trochanter. Ca of Bronchus and Breast with multiple bony metastsis were responsible for these cases. 4/11 had loose femoral component with type 2 periprosthetic fractures. 1 out of 11 had failed DCS fixation for Reverse oblique fracture. The procedures were done in a district general Hospital in the UK between August 2001–Jan 2006. The patients were mostly ASA 4.

The Cannulock Hip system offered the simplicity of a Hemiarthroplasty with an advantage of Intramedullary nailing option. This has the option of fitting standard Bipolar Head or 22 mm metallic head in case of Peri Prosthetic fracture where the acetabular component is intact. Long stem with HA coating and standard options for cemented stem insertion. The long stem with a bow enables easy insertion with distal locking facility.

In our study all the patients were excellent with both clinical and readilogical out come, however sadly 1 patient died with in 3 months of surgery. 5/6 patients with metastatic bone tumour were discharged at the mean of 8 weeks with no clinical concerns. 4 patients with femoral stem revisions and 1 patient with failed DCS were discharged at a mean of 4 months. We find the Cannulock hip arthroplasty system quite versatile in the management of these complex injuries.