Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), as a primary procedure and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) have been used to treat complex intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The failure rate after ORIF is high and TEA has often been used as a salvage procedure. Although satisfactory results have been reported after TEA as a primary procedure, there are no publications reporting the results of TEA after failed internal fixation (FIF). In this study we compared the results of patients that had TEA after FIF with those that had had primary arthroplasty (PA). We reviewed the results of 9 consecutive patients who had FIF with 12 patients who had PA. All the operations were performed by one surgeon using the same technique and same prosthesis. Both groups of patients were similar with respect to ages, sex, co-morbidity and hand dominance. The mean follow-up for both groups of patients was 5 years. At final review, patients who had had FIF had a mean Mayo score of 68 and a range of flexion/extension of 90 degrees, there was 1 infection and 1 case of loosening. The PA group had a mean Mayo score of 88 and a range of flexion/extension of 96 degrees, there were no cases of infection or loosening. This study shows the results of TEA are satisfactory either as a PA or after FIF, however the results after PA are significantly better than after FIF.
There were one hundred and three children with two part clavicle fracture (95.3%) and one required surgical fixation (1%). There were only five children with three or more fracture fragments (4.7%) and one required surgical fixation (20%). All five children who had three or more fracture fragments were found to have vertical fragment on x-ray. The average time for discharge was 27.48 days for two part fractures and 49 days for three part fractures. There were seventy-five (55.5%) adults with two part fractures and ten of them required surgical fixation (13.3%). There were fifty-nine (44.0%) with three or more fragments and eleven of them required surgical fixation (18.6%). Out of the fifty-nine fractures, which had three or more fragments, forty-eight had vertical fragment on x-ray (81.3%). Among the three part fractures, there were ten fractures with vertical fragment that required surgical fixation (20.8%). The average time for discharge was 52.07 days for two part fractures and 93.56 days for fractures with three or more fragments. There was no difference in the discharge time for non operated three part fractures with or without vertical fragment.
The presence of vertical fragment predicts higher rate of surgical intervention required due to either delayed/non union or localised skin tenting. We recommend that we should have a lower threshold to fix the 3 or more part clavicle fractures with vertical fragment.
The Copeland shoulder arthroplasty has been reported to give good results over a 5 to 10 year follow-up period. In this series all the humeral implants were inserted without cement. There was evidence of radiolucency in 30% of the humeral components. In our unit since 1995 we have implanted the Copeland shoulder hemiarthroplasty using cement around the stem of the prosthesis. We radiologically reviewed 40 patients with a mean radiological follow-up of 4.5 years. There was radiological evidence of loosening in 5%. Of this group, twenty-five patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years, with a radiological loosening rate of 8%. We would suggest that the use of a small amount of cement around the stem of the humeral component is beneficial in reducing the rate of loosening. We also feel that, as the amount of cement is small and only around the stem, if revision is required it can be undertaken without the difficulties usually associated with cemented prostheses.