This study compares the initial outcomes of minimally invasive techniques for single-event multi-level surgery with conventional single-event multi-level surgery. The minimally invasive techniques included derotation osteotomies using closed corticotomy and fixation with titanium elastic nails and percutaneous lengthening of muscles where possible. A prospective cohort study of two matched groups was undertaken. Ten children with diplegic cerebral palsy with a mean age of ten years six months (7.11 to 13.9) had multi-level minimally invasive surgery and were matched for ambulatory level and compared with ten children with a mean age of 11 years four months (7.9 to 14.4) who had conventional single-event multi-level surgery. Gait kinematics, the Gillette Gait Index, isometric muscle strength and gross motor function were assessed before and 12 months after operation.

The minimally invasive group had significantly reduced operation time and blood loss with a significantly improved time to mobilisation. There were no complications intra-operatively or during hospitalisation in either group. There was significant improvement in gait kinematics and the Gillette Gait Index in both groups with no difference between them. There was a trend to improved muscle strength in the multi-level group. There was no significant difference in gross motor function between the groups.

We consider that minimally invasive single-event multi-level surgery can be achieved safely and effectively with significant advantages over conventional techniques in children with diplegic cerebral palsy.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantify changes in lower limb muscle strength in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy 6 months after multi-level orthopaedic surgery.

Method: A consecutive sample of 20 children ( 10 girls and 10 boys, mean age 10.6) with spastic diplegia was studied prospectively. All participants had soft-tissue and bony surgical procedures performed as part of their clinical management. Physiotherapy treatment commenced following surgery. Lower limb muscle strength, pre and 6 months post-surgery, was measured, in addition to routine gait and function assessment. Maximum voluntary isometric strength of 5 muscle groups was measured bilaterally using a digital dynamometer. Paired-samples t-tests were performed.

Results: There was a marked deterioration of muscle strength (p < 0.05) in all muscle groups. Medial hamstrings and hip flexors showed the greatest decline with an average decrease of 54% and 41% respectively. Analysis of gait parameters showed a significant improvement in kinematics (p< 0.05) but a decrease in walking velocity and cadence. Motor function decreased significantly (p< 0.05). There was reduced motor power in 18 of the 20 at 6 months.

Discussion: Our results quantified objectively the magnitude of strength changes after multi-level surgery and show that weakness may be greater and persist longer than expected. This information will be useful for planning treatment after multi-level surgery and is part of a randomised trial investigating strength training. In general there is a decrease in power but an improvement in gait.