Background: 75% of Achilles tendon ruptures are related to physical activities.

The best method of treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture is still debated. Treatment options can be classified as Nonoperative based on cast immobilization, open surgery, and percutaneous surgery based on passing sutures through several stab incisions.

Common complications include re-ruptures, infection, wound problems and sural nerve injury. Recent reports of percutaneous surgery show good functional outcome, low incidence of re-ruptures, fewer wound healing problems and prompt recovery.

Objective: Assessment of percutaneous operative treatment outcome.

Methods: 73 patients treated for acute Achilles tendon rupture with percutaneous surgery in the past eight years are followed. Evaluations were preformed at an average of 34.6 months postoperatively (range, 17 to 54 months). Outcome was evaluated by analyzing Epidemiologic, subjective and objective parameters.

Results: The patients demonstrated good functional outcome, with none – to mild limitations in recreational activities. Ankle range of motion was not statistically different between both ankles. Evaluation of strength and power with the Cybex II dynamometer revealed a difference at 240 deg/sec for plantar flexion power between the injured and healthy leg, but no difference at 30 and 90 deg/sec, or in dorsiflexion power and strength.

Complication rate was low: sural nerve injury (1 patient), superficial wound infection (2 patients), suture granuloma (4 patients) and re-rupture (1 patient).

Conclusions: In our series, percutaneous operative treatment was found to be simple, fast and can be done under local anesthesia. Our low complication rate and excellent functional results make this treatment an appealing alternative to either conservative or open surgical suture.

1 . Twenty-one cases of poliomyelitis and twenty cases of brachial plexus injury in which muscle transplantations had been performed to restore elbow flexion have been reviewed. The average follow-up period was four and a half years.

2. The results were graded objectively and subjectively. They were better when passive extension of the elbow was limited; such limitation always occurs after Steindler's operation, but infrequently after pectoral transplantation.

3. The results of pectoral transplantation are good when there is no significant shoulder paralysis; if there is shoulder weakness arthrodesis of the joint may be required to control medial rotation and adduction of the shoulder on flexion of the elbow. In brachial plexus lesions the results of pectoral transplantation may be marred by simultaneous contraction of the triceps. This can be overcome by transplanting triceps into the flexor apparatus. Triceps transplantation is rarely indicated because loss of active extension of the elbow is a grave disability.

4. Subjective results tended to be worse than objective results in brachial plexus lesions because impairment of sensibility in the hand often limited the usefulness of the limb. In striking contrast the subjective results were in general far better than the objective in patients who had had poliomyelitis. In them the smallest gain can be of functional value.