The frequency of revision hip arthroplasty is increasing with the increasing life expectancy and number of individuals treated with joint replacement. Newer porous implants have been introduced which may provide better treatment options for revision arthroplasty. These may require cementation to other prosthesis components and occasionally to bone, however, there is currently no information on how these porous implants interface with cement. Cylindrical bone (control group) and porous metal probes with a diameter and height of 10mm were created and subsequently cemented in a standardized setting. These were placed under tensile and torsional loading scenarios. In this experimental study, 10 human femoral heads were used to create 20 cylindrical probes with a diameter and height of 10mm. One side was tapered to 6mm for cementation and interface evaluation. A further set of 20 probes of a porous metal implant (Trabecular Metal®) was created with the same geometry. After the probes were created and lavaged, they were cemented at the tapered surface using a medium viscosity cement at a constant cementation pressure (1.2N/mm2). The setup allowed for comparison of the porous metal/cement interface (group A) with the well-studied control group interface bone/cement (group B). The maximal interface stability of groups A and B were evaluated under tensile and rotational loading scenarios and the cement penetration was measured.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Periprosthetic medial tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare but represent a serious complication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Most common treatment of these fractures is osteosynthesis with canulated screws or plates. The aim of this study was to evaluate these two different treatment options of periprosthetic fractures. The hypothesis was that osteosynthetic treatment with plates show significantly higher maximum fracture loads than fixation with cannulated screws.Introduction
Aim
