Aims

After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However, little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques, if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction.

In proximal humerus reconstructions, osteoarticular massive allograft (OA) allows a biologic reattachment of tendineous structures of the host providing stability and functional recovery. Allograft-prosthesis composites (APC) are more technically demanding, but functional advantages with new prosthetic design are expected with lower fracture and failure rate with time. We compared the outcome of patients treated with OA reconstruction (group A) and patients treated with an APC (group B) after humerus resection for bone tumours.

Thirty six patients treated between 1996 and 2009 were included in the study (18 group A; 18 group B). The diagnosis was a malignant bone tumour in 28 cases, an aggressive benign bone tumour in 6 and a bone metastasis in 2. Three total humerus resections were performed (two in group A and one in group B). Three different type of prosthesis were used (conventional, reverse and resurfacing). In group A, at an average follow-up of 66 months (2-116), 16 patients were continuously disease free.

Ten patients (56%) had no complication; in 6 cases (33%) we observed a fracture of the graft and in 3 cases (17%) a pseudoarthrosis. In group B, at an average follow up of 44 months (3-164), 16 patients were continuously disease free.

Thirteen patients (72%) had no complication, in 2 cases (11%) stem loosening, in 2 cases (11%) dislocation, in 1 case pseudoarthrosis and in 1 case resorption and detachment of allograft's great tuberosity was observed. Functional outcome was evaluated using MSTS scoring system: a mean score of 24 (13-30) in group A and 23 (15-27) in group B was observed.

In our experience, proximal humerus APC showed functional results comparable to OA allograft with lower complication rate.

In conclusion, in biologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus, APC seems to provide a more reliable solution than OA allograft at long term

Aim

While the association of surgery and radiation therapy in high grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) of extremities is considered the “golden standard”, there is not international agreement regarding type, timing, overall dose of radiation, and size, site and histology of tumours to be irradiated. A similar consideration is about low grade STS. The aim of our paper is critically reconsider our experience, trough a retrospective analysis of 15 years experience. This in order to propose a perspective protocol of treatment of high and low grade STS, in order to minimize the late complication rate.

Several techniques have been described to reconstruct a mobile wrist joint after resection of the distal radius for tumour. We reviewed our experience of using an osteo-articular allograft to do this in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.9 months (28 to 119).

The mean range of movement at the wrist was 56° flexion, 58° extension, 84° supination and 80° pronation. The mean ISOLS-MSTS score was 86% (63% to 97%) and the mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 16.5 (3 to 34). There was no local recurrence or distant metastases. The procedure failed in one patient with a fracture of the graft and an arthrodesis was finally required. Union was achieved at the host-graft interface in all except two cases. No patient reported more than modest non-disabling pain and six reported no pain at all. Radiographs showed early degenerative changes at the radiocarpal joint in every patient.

A functional pain-free wrist can be restored with an osteo-articular allograft after resection of the distal radius for bone tumour, thereby avoiding the donor site morbidity associated with an autograft. These results may deteriorate with time.

We reviewed 25 patients who had undergone resection of a primary bone sarcoma which extended to within 5 cm of the knee with reconstruction by a combination of a free vascularised fibular graft and a massive allograft bone shell. The distal femur was affected in four patients and the proximal tibia in 21. Their mean age at the time of operation was 19.7 years (5 to 52) and the mean follow-up period 140 months (28 to 213). Three vascularised transfers failed. The mean time to union of the fibula was 5.6 months (3 to 10) and of the allograft 19.6 months (10 to 34). Full weight-bearing was allowed at a mean of 21.4 months (14 to 36). The mean functional score at final follow-up was 27.4 (18 to 30) using a modfied 30-point Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating system. The overall limb-salvage rate was 88%. The results of our study suggest that the combined use of a vascularised fibular graft and allograft is of value as a limb-salvage procedure for intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone tumours around the knee, especially in skeletally immature patients.