The Vancouver Classification System presents a systematic approach to classification of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur (PFPFs) that has been validated in previous studies. However, with the introduction of tapered fluted stems and cable plates since the introduction of the Vancouver System, the connection between fracture class and the preferred method of treatment is often unclear. The present study was undertaken to identify fracture patterns surrounding contemporary femoral stems and the relationship between the current method of treatment and the Vancouver Class of the periprosthetic fracture. Three experienced joint surgeons collected plain radiographs (AP and lateral) and CT/MR scans (n=40) from 72 cases of Vancouver A or B periprosthetic fractures performed over the period 2016–2018. We identified the mode of primary stem fixation and the Vancouver grade of the fracture (A, B1, B2 or B3). Two independent investigators examined all imaging studies and the intraoperative records and recorded: (i) and the location and distribution of the fracture surfaces, and (ii) the presence of incomplete cortical fractures that had initiated within the femoral cortex without completing propagation and (iii) the method of operative treatment. These data were analyzed to examine the incidence of fractures within more than one femoral zone and differences in the fracture patterns corresponding to each Vancouver class.Introduction
Methods
