Culture of multiple intraoperative tissue samples is the standard of microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. Recently, improved sensitivity of using prosthesis sonication method and molecular techniques has been reported in the literature. However, collecting the removed prosthesis as well as additional specimens for molecular analysis is not straightforward for the surgeons and assistants in the operation theatre. Our All-in-a-Box concept addresses the need for simple and unambiguous sampling of clinical specimens in the operating theatre, and to overcome the variation in sampling technique within and between surgical teams and across different hospitals.

The All-in-a-Box concept was developed in close cooperation between surgeons, their operating assistants, clinical microbiologists and molecular biologists in order to ensure the concept is easily implemented in the operating theatre, achieving high completeness, and being well preserved all the way to the laboratory.

All needed equipment, vials and forms are collected in a single box, and corresponding items are clearly color coded to further reduce the likelihood of confusion.

Boxes are designed to address the specific needs for either routine diagnosis or special demands as in clinical studies. Their design is based on large experience in connection with diagnosis of joint prosthesis-related infections. Downstream SOPs for sample processing are included in the All-in-a-box concept and specimens can subsequently be analyzed in parallel by culturing and molecular methods.

We have implemented this concept in two large research projects, we received 1508 (89%) of 1685 scheduled samples during the 2-year project period in the first project despite several different surgical teams and hospitals, while the other project is still ongoing.

All-in-a-Box is useful concept to improve the completeness of routine sampling for microbial analysis.

Identification of modalities and procedures to improve the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic cases in patients with joint-related pain after total hip or knee alloplasty (THA/TKA).

A prospective cohort of 147 patients presenting with problems related to previous THA or TKA was included and subjected to a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm. The standard diagnostics were supplemented with novel or improved methods for sampling of clinical specimens, sonication of retrieved implant parts, prolonged and effective culture of microorganisms, and dedicated clinical samples for molecular biological detection and identification of microorganisms. Furthermore, comprehensive pain investigations and nuclear imaging were employed. For each case the clinical management was decided upon in a clinical conference with participation of clinical microbiologist, orthopedics and experts in nuclear imaging. The clinical management of patients was blinded against the molecular biological detection of microorganisms.

Patients grouped as follows: 69 aseptic, 19 acute septic, 19 chronic septic, 40 pain/unresolved. Sonication of retrieved implant parts resulted in detection of biofilm not detected by standard specimens, i.e. joint fluid and periprosthetic tissue biopsies. Next generation sequencing detected and identified few infections not detected by culture. Molecular analyses showed more polymicrobial infections than culture. Nuclear imaging was inconclusive with respect to recommendation of changed setup. Analysis of blood based biomarkers is ongoing. Patients with chronic pain are undergoing follow-up.

The special emphasis put on detection of infections resulted in detection of infections in joints that otherwise would have been categorized as aseptic loosening. Clinical management for these cases was changed accordingly. The cross-disciplinary clinical conference is considered valuable for clinical management. The clinical relevance of the polymicrobial nature of infections as diagnosed employing next generation sequencing is yet to be established. Long-term follow-up is planned.

Optimal sampling for culture-based or molecular diagnosis remains highly contested for patients suspected of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Most existing studies have a retrospective design without a standardized sampling strategy. Therefore, the results are difficult to translate into guidelines. We have conducted a 2-year prospective study with a sampling strategy adaptable to the specific procedure in patients with either hip or knee alloplasty. Thus, comparisons of results obtained with different specimen types and diagnostic methods are possible.

The study enrolled patients with a painful hip or knee alloplasty. The sampling strategy for microbiological diagnosis included multiple specimens of each type (joint fluid, tissue biopsies, bone biopsies, and swabs taken from the prosthesis in situ), and prosthetic components (if removed). Prepacked boxes with containers and accessories for sampling, transport and storage were provided. Microbial culture and bacterial 16S rDNA screening were carried out for all specimen types. Whenever positive upon 16S rDNA screening, samples were analyzed further by sequencing. Peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization (optimized using filtrations; Filter-PNA-FISH) was limited to a subset thereof.

An overall completeness of ∼90% was obtained by the sampling strategy in 164 procedures (‘cases’) in 131 patients. In 58 cases PJI was suspected, and a revision was carried out. 42 cases were culture-positive, and 16 were culture-negative; one culture-negative case was positive by 16S rDNA sequencing of a corresponding specimen. The contribution to a microbiological diagnosis was high for periprosthetic tissue biopsies (≥ 3 positive out of 5) 90%, prosthetic component(s) 90%, and joint fluid 94%. Conversely, the contribution was sparse for prosthetic swabs 50% and bone biopsies 40%, respectively. Filter-PNA-FISH was used to confirm findings by culture and to demonstrate biofilm formation.

With the described sampling strategy we reached high completeness of complex specimen sets. The sampling strategy may be adapted to other clinical settings with microbiological sampling of similar complexity. We found multiple periprosthetic tissue biopsies, prosthetic component(s) and joint fluid to form the optimal specimen set for culture-based diagnosis. The contribution by 16S rDNA sequencing is still under investigations but the contributions seems moderate probably because of a low rate of antibiotic therapy before the procedure, use of effective culture methods and prolonged incubation (14 days).