header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 40 - 41
1 Mar 2005
Chirodian N Saw T Villar R
Full Access

Hip resurfacing has in recent years become increasingly popular as an arthroplasty technique, particularly amongst younger patients with more active lifestyles. The procedure has been heralded as a more conservative option, aimed at those wishing to continue strenuous work and recreational activities. In the populalapress and the internet, many claims are made regarding aspects of this procedure, but little evidence has appeared in the scientific literature, either with the results of resurfacing or comparing resurfacing to conventional total hip arthroplasty.

We compare the outcomes of a consecutive series of 44 hybrid hip resurfacings against a similar series of 50 conventional hybrid hip arthroplasties (THR’s), all performed in patients aged 60 or under by a single consultant Surgeon. Data on operation time, blood loss, and length of stay, as well as complications, were all prospectively recorded. A modified Harris Hip score was also documented preoperatively, as well as at 6, 26 and 52 weeks postoperatively. In the resurfacing group, there were 28 Male and 16 female, mean age 47.6 years. In the THR group, there were 22 male and 28 female patients, of mean age 51.9 years. The results for the two groups were analysed, and p value of < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

The results showed no difference in operation time or blood loss. There was a small reduction in average length of stay from 7.1 to 6.4 days, which was not clinically significant, while the Modified Harris Hip Scores at 6 and 52 weeks were the same for both groups. We conclude that whilst it has been previously shown that there is an overall preservation of bone stock following resurfacing arthroplasty, there is no evidence to back additional claimed benefits.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 5 | Pages 655 - 658
1 Jul 2004
Saw T Villar R

We have reviewed a consecutive series of six professional footballers who presented with intractable hip pain which was attributed at arthroscopy, to an anterior acetabular labral tear with adjacent chondral damage. The location and type of labral tear were identical for each patient. There was no evidence of acetabular dysplasia. A variable area of chondral damage was associated with the labral tear.

All unstable tissue was resected. Five returned to professional football at the highest level. Acetabular labral pathology should be included in the differential diagnosis of footballers with hip or groin pain. Arthroscopy of the hip is an appropriate method of diagnosis and treatment and minimises the length of rehabilitation required.