Mechanical stabilization following periprosthetic fractures is challenging. A variety of cable and crimping devices with different design configurations are available for clinical use. This study evaluated the mechanical performance of 5 different cable systems in vitro. The effect of crimping device position on the static failure properties were examined using a idealized testing set up. Five cable systems were used in this study; Accord (Smith & Nephew), Cable Ready (Zimmer), Dall-Miles (Stryker), Osteo Clage (Acumed) and Control Cable (DePuy). Cables were looped over two 25 mm steel rods. Cable tension was applied to the maximum amount using the manufactures instrumentation. Devices were crimped by orthopaedic surgeon according to instructions. Crimping device/sleeve was secured in two different positions; 1. Long axis in-line with the load; 2. Long axis perpendicular to the load (Fig 1). Four constructs were tested for each cable system at each position. All constructs were tested following equilibration in phosphate buffered saline at 37 degrees Celsius using a servohydraulic testing machine (MTS 858 Bionix Testing Machine, MTS Systems) at a displacement rate of 10 mm per minute until failure. The failure load, stiffness and failure model (cable failure or slippage) was determined for all samples. Data was analysed using a two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Games Howell post hoc test. One sample of each cable – crimping construct was embedded in PMMA and sectioned to examine the crimping mechanism.Introduction
Materials and Methods
