header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_21 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Dec 2017
Goldberg A Glazebrook M Daniels T de Vries G Pedersen M Younger A Singh D Blundell C Sakellariou A Baumhauer J
Full Access

Introduction

Studies have compared outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ1) implant hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis, but there is a paucity of data on the influence of patient factors on outcomes. We evaluated data from a prospective, RCT of MTPJ1 implant hemiarthroplasty (Cartiva) and arthrodesis to determine the association between patient factors and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients ≥18 years with Coughlin hallux rigidus grade 2, 3, or 4 were treated with implant MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty or arthrodesis. Pain VAS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports and ADL, and SF-36 PF scores were obtained preoperatively, and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 52 and 104 weeks postoperatively. Final outcomes, MTPJ1 active peak dorsiflexion, secondary procedures, radiographs and safety parameters were evaluated for 129 implant hemiarthroplasties and 47 arthrodeses. Composite primary endpoint criteria for clinical success included pain reduction ≥30%, maintenance/improvement in function, and no radiographic complications or secondary surgical intervention at 24 months. Predictor variables included: grade; gender; age; BMI; symptom duration; prior MTPJ1 surgery; preoperative hallux valgus angle, ROM, and pain. Two-sided Fisher's Exact test was used (p< 0.05).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 26 - 26
1 Dec 2015
Baumhauer J Singh D Glazebrook M Blundell C Wansbrough G de Vries G Le I Nielson D Petersen E Sakellariou A Solan M Younger A Daniels T
Full Access

Patients with advanced stage hallux rigidus from 12 centers in Canada and the UK were randomized (2:1) to treatment with a small (8/10 mm) hydrogel implant (Cartiva) or 1st MTP arthrodesis. VAS pain scale, validated outcome measures (FAAM sport scale), great toe active dorsiflexion motion, secondary procedures, radiographic assessment and safety parameters were evaluated.

236 patients were initially enrolled, 17 patients withdrew prior to randomization, 17 patients withdrew after randomization and 22 were non-randomized training patients, leaving 152 implant and 50 arthrodesis patients. Standard demographics and baseline outcomes were similar for both groups.

Mean VAS pain scores decreased from 6.8 and 6.9 respectively for the implant and arthrodesis groups from baseline to 1.4 and 0.7 at 24 months. Similarly, the FAAM sports score improved significantly from baseline levels of 37 and 36 to 24 months level of 77 and 82 respectively for the implant and arthrodesis groups. First MTP active dorsiflexion motion improved an average of 4° at 3 months after implant placement and was maintained at 24 months.

Secondary surgeries occurred in 17 (11.2%) implant patients and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients. Fourteen (9.2%) implants were removed and converted to arthrodesis and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients had painful hardware requiring removal. There was no case of implant fragmentation, wear, or bone loss. Analysis of a single composite endpoint utilizing the three primary study outcomes (pain, function, and safety) showed statistical equivalence between the2groups.

Conclusion

In patients requiring surgery for advanced stage hallux rigidus, treatment with a small synthetic cartilage implant resulted in comparable clinically important pain relief and functional outcomes compared to 1st MTP arthrodesis while preserving and often improving great toe motion. Secondary surgical intervention was similar in the implant and arthrodesis groups. Revision from a small implant plug to arthrodesis can be performed if needed.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1317 - 1319
1 Oct 2013
Gougoulias N Dawe EJC Sakellariou A

Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion.

We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19.