Cross-linking of polyethylene greatly reduces its wear rate in hip simulator studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing cross-linked to conventional polyethylene liners for total hip arthroplasty to determine if there is a clinical reduction of: 1) wear rates, 2) radiographic osteolysis, and 3) need for total hip revision. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was conducted from inception to May 2010 for all trials involving the use of cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty. Eligibility for inclusion in the review was: use of a random allocation of treatments; a treatment arm receiving cross-linked polyethylene and a treatment arm receiving conventional polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty; and use of radiographic wear as an outcome measure. Eligible studies were obtained and read in full by two co-authors who then independently applied the Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Nonpharmacological Trial to each study. Pooled mean differences were calculated for the following continuous outcomes: bedding-in, linear wear rate, three dimensional linear wear rate, volumetric wear rate, and total linear wear. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for radiographic osteolysis and revision hip arthroplasty.Purpose
Method
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing cross-linked with conventional polyethylene liners for total hip replacement in order to determine whether these liners reduce rates of wear, radiological evidence of osteolysis and the need for revision. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched from their inception to May 2010 for all trials involving the use of cross-linked polyethylene in total hip replacement. Eligibility for inclusion in the review included the random allocation of treatments, the use of cross-linked and conventional polyethylene, and radiological wear as an outcome measure. The pooled mean differences were calculated for bedding-in, linear wear rate, three-dimensional linear wear rate, volumetric wear rate and total linear wear. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for radiological osteolysis and revision hip replacement. A search of the literature identified 194 potential studies, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria. All reported a significant reduction in radiological wear for cross-linked polyethylene. The pooled mean differences for linear rate of wear, three-dimensional linear rate of wear, volumetric wear rate and total linear wear were all significantly reduced for cross-linked polyethylene. The risk ratio for radiological osteolysis was 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.58; I2 = 0%), favouring cross-linked polyethylene. The follow-up was not long enough to show a difference in the need for revision surgery.
