The modern modular implants allow surgeons to combine different combinations of components within the same brand of which some may have completely different design. During 1999–2012 the same cemented femur component was used together with a cemented stemmed tibia baseplate and also against a cemented pegged tibia baseplate. We decided to compare the revision rate of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) using these two tibia baseplates. This is a register study. During 1999–2012, 32,429 cemented, CR TKA's of a specific brand were reported to the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR). The part numbers for the femur, tibia and insert (in modular implants) were available in 99.2% of cases. The most common combination used the cemented CR femur against a cemented stemmed baseplate in 50.3% of cases while the same CR femur was used against a cemented pegged baseplate in 8.3% of cases, mainly at two hospitals. In order to make the material more comparable, only patients having osteoarthritis (OA) were included and only TKAs using two types of regular constraint inserts and in which the patella had been left un-resurfaced. Chi-Square test was used to investigate gender distribution in the groups and t-test for the mean age at surgery. Kaplan Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the risk of revision until the end of 2016. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Background
Methods
We identified a group of patients from the Swedish
Arthroplasty Register who reported no relief of pain or worse pain
one year after a total knee replacement (TKR). A total of two different
patient-reported pain scores were used during this process. We then
evaluated how the instruments used to measure pain affected the
number of patients who reported no relief of pain or worse pain,
and the relative effect of potential risk factors. Between 2008 and 2010, 2883 TKRs were performed for osteoarthritis
in two Swedish arthroplasty units. After applying exclusion criteria,
2123 primary TKRs (2123 patients) were included in the study. The
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a Visual
Analogue Scale (VAS) for knee pain were used to assess patients pre-operatively
and one year post-operatively. Only 50 of the 220 patients (23%) who reported no pain relief
on either the KOOS pain subscale or the VAS for knee pain did so
with both of these instruments. Patients who reported no pain relief
on either measure tended to have less pain pre-operatively but a
higher degree of anxiety. Charnley category C was a predictor for
not gaining pain relief as measured on a VAS for knee pain. The number of patients who are not relieved of pain after a TKR
differs considerably depending on the instrument used to measure
pain. Cite this article:
We are entering a new era with governmental bodies
taking an increasingly guiding role, gaining control of registries,
demanding direct access with release of open public information
for quality comparisons between hospitals. This review is written
by physicians and scientists who have worked with the Swedish Knee
Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) periodically since it began. It reviews
the history of the register and describes the methods used and lessons
learned. Cite this article:
