The identification of the extent of neural damage
in patients with acute or chronic spinal cord injury is imperative for
the accurate prediction of neurological recovery. The changes in
signal intensity shown on routine MRI sequences are of limited value
for predicting functional outcome. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
is a novel radiological imaging technique which has the potential
to identify intact nerve fibre tracts, and has been used to image
the brain for a variety of conditions. DTI imaging of the spinal
cord is currently only a research tool, but preliminary studies
have shown that it holds considerable promise in predicting the
severity of spinal cord injury. This paper briefly reviews our current knowledge of this technique.
Failures of treatment of osteoid osteoma (OO) are related to errors in exact localization and incomplete excision of the nidus. Intraoperative Iso-C 3D navigation allows exact localization, excision and confirmation of excision by percutaneous methods. We report the successful percutaneous excision of OO in 11 patients (extremities-5; spine-6). All patients had a minimally invasive reflective array (MIRA) fixed to the same bone in the extremities and to the adjacent spinous process or body(caudal) in spine, followed by registration of anatomy. A tool navigator was utilized to plan the key hole incision so that the trajectory did not involve important anatomical structure. A sleeve was then introduced which allowed the usage of instruments like a burr and curette to deroof the nidus, curette the nidus and obtain material for histopathology and further burr the cavity to ensure complete eradication of the nidus. During the entire procedure, the tool navigator was used frequently to reconfirm the location and the depth of burring. Following excision, registration using Iso-C 3D C-arm was done to confirm the complete eradication of the nidus. The age of the patients varied from 10 years to 27 years. In the extremities, location of the MIRA was in the same bone and firm anchorage was obtained using either a single Steinman pin locator (4 patients) or a double pin locator (1 patient). In spine the MIRA was attached to the adjacent spinous process (caudal) in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region (5 patients) and in sacrum (1 patient) it was attached using a Steinman pin to the adjacent vertebral body. Excellent three-dimensional view of the nidus and localization was possible in all patients. A safe trajectory that avoided anatomical structures was possible in all patients using a tool navigator. The incision ranged from 1 to 4 cms. Adequate material for histology was obtained in ten patients that confirmed the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma and in one patient histopathological confirmation was not possible because the nidus was completely destroyed during the process of deroofing and burring. In ten patients, post excision ISO-C 3D scans confirmed adequate removal and in one patient, it was successful in identifying incomplete removal requiring further excision of the nidus. The average operating time was 62 mins (37–90 mins) and the blood loss was less than 30 cc in all patients. All patients achieved excellent pain relief and were asymptomatic at an average follow up of 3.4 (2.2 – 3.9) years. Iso-C 3 D navigation offers the advantage of excellent localization of the nidus and percutaneous excision of these tumors, thereby conserving bone in critical locations like the spine and upper end of femur. It also offers the advantage of intraoperative confirmation of adequate excision and allows harvesting the nidus for histological confirmation.
Limb-injury severity scores are designed to assess orthopaedic and vascular injuries. In Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB injuries they have poor sensitivity and specificity to predict salvage or outcome. We have designed a trauma score to grade the severity of injury to the covering tissues, the bones and the functional tissues, grading the three components from one to five. Seven comorbid conditions known to influence the management and prognosis have been given a score of two each. The score was validated in 109 consecutive open injuries of the tibia, 42 type-IIIA and 67 type-IIIB. The total score was used to assess the possibilities of salvage and the outcome was measured by dividing the injuries into four groups according to their scores as follows: group I scored less than 5, group II 6 to 10, group III 11 to 15 and group IV 16 or more. A score of 14 to indicate amputation had the highest sensitivity and specificity. Our trauma score compared favourably with the Mangled Extremity Severity score in sensitivity (98% and 99%), specificity (100% and 17%), positive predictive value (100% and 97.5%) and negative predictive value (70% and 50%), respectively. A receiver-operating characteristic curve constructed for 67 type-IIIB injuries to assess the efficiency of the scores to predict salvage, showed that the area under the curve for this score was better (0.988 (± 0.013 The scoring system was found to be simple in application and reliable in prognosis for both limb-salvage and outcome measures in type-IIIA and type-IIIB open injuries of the tibia.