In the late 1980's Michael Freeman conceived the idea that knee replacement would most closely replicate the natural knee joint, if the medial Tibio-Femoral articulation was configured as a “ball-in-socket”. Over the last three decades, medial rotation and medial pivot designs have proved successful in clinical use. Freeman's final iteration of the medial ball-in-socket concept was the Medial Sphere knee. We report the three-year survivorship, clinical outcomes, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic analysis of this implant in a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, prospective observational study. Patients awaiting total knee replacement were recruited by four centres. They had no medical contraindication to surgery, were able to provide informed consent and were available for follow-up. Primary outcome was implant survival at six months, one, two, three and five years. Secondary outcomes were patient reported outcome measures: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Euroqol (EQ-5D), International Knee Society Score (IKSS), IKSS Functional score and Health State score, complications and radiographic outcomes. Radiographic analysis was undertaken using the TraumaCad software and data analysis was undertaken using SPSS.Background
Methods
There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the migration of femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty following the use of impaction allografting with or without cement. In some cemented series distal migration of the prosthesis within the cement mantle has been recorded, as well as migration of the whole cement/prosthesis construct into the graft. The results of 26 cases of revision hip replacement using femoral impaction allografting in the absence of bone cement are reported. The mean follow up was 8.5 years (range 4 to 17 years). The technique employed a Freeman stem coated proximally with hydroxyapatite. Three cases required further revision at 2, 4 and 5 years for high subsidence and unacceptable thigh pain. The remaining 23 cases stabilised following a period of initial settlement and overall results have been comparable to other series that have utilised cement. The initial sinkage in this series occurred mainly in the first six postoperative months. These results, from a single surgeon series, demonstrate that the method is highly technique dependent and relies on adequate graft impaction.Introduction
Method and Results
An attempt to analyse whether impaction allografting without cement is more or less satisfactory than the technique with the addition of cement is compromised by conflicting reports of where the migration actually occurs. In some cemented series distal migration of the prosthesis within the cement mantle has been recorded as well as migration of the whole cement/prosthesis construct into the graft. Two prospective consecutive series of revision hip arthroplasties by a single surgeon:- Group 1; Uncemented impaction grafting revision hip replacement in a series of 30 patients (33 hips). Group 2; Cemented impaction grafting revision hip replacement in a series of 30 patients (31 hips). Group demographics were similar. Each case used the same design of hip implant with the only difference in design being a proximal hydroxyapatite coating used on the uncemented implants. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 17 years for the uncemented group and from 1 to 11 years for the cemented group. A validated hip scoring system was employed at regular follow up incorporating pain and functional assessment. Migration rates for the uncemented group were 0 to 15 mm for 30 hips; however 3 hips were revised early due to excessive migration. 3 hips sustained early complications (1 fracture, 1 dislocation, 1 varus malposition of stem). Migration rates for the cemented group were 0 to 9 mm for 29 hips, however the remaining 3 hips were revised due to excessive migration (up to 33mm). Although similar results were obtained in terms of success and also pain and function scores, marginal improvement in results did occur with the cemented series overall. Statistical significance was not reached however. More sinkage occurred in the uncemented group overall, the majority occurring in the first 6 post-operative months. Part of the improvement with the cemented series results may be explained by the improved techniques achieved whilst performing the uncemented series. These results from a single surgeon demonstrate that the method is highly technique dependent and relies on adequate graft impaction. With sufficient graft and an appropriate prosthetic design, cement is not essential to the early success of this method. However, the extent of the initial migration did not accurately predict a successful outcome for the procedure. The absence of cement removes any confusion as to the location of any migration.
