The use of tourniquet in lower limb orthopaedic surgery is well established, however, it does have associated risks and complications and its use has been previously questioned. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements and time to discharge in patients undergoing tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted routine knee arthroscopy.

A total of 40 patients were randomised to tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted groups. Arthroscopy was performed using a standardised local anaesthetic infiltration in the non-tourniquet assisted group. All patients completed a postoperative pain score.

Findings demonstrated that the incidence and mean scores for postoperative pain were significantly lower in the non-tourniquet group. Additionally postoperative analgesic requirements of patients in the non-tourniquet group were also found to be significantly lower and time spent in recovery and on the ward postoperatively was also lower in the non-tourniquet group compared to the tourniquet group.

On the basis of the results in our study we recommend abolishing the use of tourniquet in routine knee arthroscopies in the virgin knee.

Introduction: With the introduction of out-patient waiting time targets, there has been increasing pressure on clinics to accommodate both new referrals and follow-up patients. Departments have found it increasingly difficult to continue long-term follow-up of patients post arthroplasty.

We have piloted a new system of purely therapist led clinics and assessed this with an anonymous patient survey.

Method: Since 2005 and following a training program for the therapists involved, 110 arthroplasty patients have passed through the new clinics. They are seen at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months and then 3, 5 and 10 years. Their ROM, stability and XRAY findings are documented and each patient completes Oxford Knee, SF 12 and WOMAC scores. If there are problems at any stage they are seen in the surgeon led clinic.

Results: 69% of patients responded to the survey and in general they were very satisfied with the new system. 75% felt that been seen by the therapist alone still fully addressed their needs with 79% having an overall impression of either excellent or very good. The patients rated the therapists professionalism, assessment and information delivery as good to excellent in over 80%.

Conclusion: We feel that with the introduction of this new system, we will be able to continue long-term follow-up of all our patients post arthroplasty. With their regular assessments and scoring we will be able to monitor the success of their replacements and theoretically identify early any problems.

Introduction: Postoperative overdistention of the bladder produces chronic, irreversible changes in the detrusor muscle. This study investigated whether an effective epidural, may cause postoperative overdistention of the bladder.

Methods: A retrospective single surgeon/unit study of 144 male patients who had undergone spinal surgery over a two year period was undertaken. Data was collected into two groups: Patients requiring catheterisation and those that did not. All patients received a 16G epidural catheter inserted at the end of the procedure.

Demographics, operation type and epidural rate were all correlated with the need for catheterization. In all cases the residual volumes were recorded.

Results: Patients remained on postoperative epidural analgesia for an average of 50hours. 54 patients required urinary catheterisation. The average postoperative duration until catheterisation was 18hours, with a maximum of 33hours.

The average residual volume at catheterization was 936mls, with a maximum of 2200mls. All patients were managed with intermittent catheterisation, most, (63%) requiring only a single episode before spontaneously voiding.

Discussion: Although patients in the catheterised group were older, (p< 0.05), we found no other significant differences in patients that subsequently required catheterisation, when compared for operation type, or epidural infusion rates.

We were therefore unable to predict which patients would require catheterisation. Questioning and bladder palpation was found to be unreliable when assessing overdistention.

Our study demonstrated that patients undergoing spinal surgery using epidural analgesia should be closely monitored in order to prevent overdistention of the bladder and has led to a proactive regimen for spinal patients with epidural analgesia in our unit.

Introduction This is a Prospective Comparative cohort study to determine the change in the Low Back Outcomes Score (LBOS) after intensive non-operative, multi-disciplinary treatment for low back pain and to compare this with data collected from earlier cohorts undergoing surgical fusion. Recently published Randomised Controlled Trials have been inconclusive regarding the benefits of surgery compared with rehabilitation for low back pain. We examine this question using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS) as an outcome measure.

Methods The LBOS was acquired prior to and two years following treatment in cohorts undergoing fusion or rehabilitation for low back pain. Follow up was 70% and 90% respectively. The surgical group had a lower starting LBOS ( 18 v 27) but the rehabilitation group had a higher proportion of cases involved in compensation, litigation, and who were not working.

Results A significantly greater improvement in LBOS was seen in the surgically treated group than was seen in the rehabilitation group (18 v 10)

Discussion Although we do not propose surgery before non-operative treatments are exhausted, these results suggest that surgical treatment can have significant benefits for selected patients who have not improved despite a state of the art rehabilitation programme.

Aim: To review results and complications of revision knee replacements.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 41 cases of cemented revision knee arthroplasty in 39 patients (15 male, 24 female) performed between 1993 and 2003. Data regarding clinical and functional outcomes and complications was recorded.

Results: Mean age at index (revision) operation was 67.8 years (32 to 86) and mean follow-up was 6.8 years (1.5 to 12). Average time to revision was 80 months (9 months to 23 years).

The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in 16 cases, and deep sepsis in 13 cases, (12 were done in 2 stages). Others included polyethylene wear in 4 knees, instability in 2, and 1 each of peri-prosthetic fracture, implant breakage and pain of undetermined origin. 3 revisions were performed for failed Link Lubinus patello-femoral replacement. Mean interval between staged procedures for sepsis was 2 months.

Reconstruction was performed using the Kinemax Revision system with the use of augments and stems. The modular rotating hinge was used in 4 cases. Surgical exposure included additional lateral release in 7 cases, tibial tubercle osteotomy in 4 and quadriceps snip in one.

Complications: Included 1 post-operative death due to haematemesis and 2 non-fatal cardiac complications. 1 patient was re-revised for aseptic loosening at 3.5 years, 1 needed an above knee amputation for intractable sepsis after multiple failed reconstructions and 1 is awaiting patellar revision.

At latest review, 7 patients had died due to unrelated causes with a pain free functioning knee prosthesis. Of the remaining 31, 26 patients had none or minimal pain. 21 were independently mobile with a satisfactory range of motion.10 patients needed a walking stick.

Conclusion: Revision total knee replacement can give satisfactory results in the short to medium term, although the complication rate can be significant. The procedure should be performed in specialist units. Revision in 2 stages for sepsis resulted in satisfactory control of infection in our study.