A shoulder dislocation is defined as chronic when it has been unreduced for more than one week. Chronic anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly encountered in Kwazulu-Natal for various reasons. Different surgical options exist to treat chronic anterior shoulder dislocations. However the outcome of surgically treated chronic shoulder dislocations has not been favourable in all studies. We report on a combined case series of chronic anterior shoulder dislocations previously treated at Edendale Hospital (EDH), Pietermaritzburg and Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH), Durban. Patients were identified retrospectively using departmental databases and their case files were retrieved. Patient demographics, duration of dislocation, mechanism of injury and reason for delayed treatment were recorded. When available, X-rays, CT scans and MRI scans were retrieved to identify associated bony and soft tissue pathology. Surgical outcome was assessed using range of movement (ROM), change in pain severity, patient satisfaction, as well as Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OIS) and Rowe and Zarins score. Post-operative complications including redislocations were also identified.Background:
Methods:
Hypoplasia of the glenoid is a rare condition caused by incomplete ossification of the postero-inferior aspect of the developing glenoid. It may be isolated or associated with a more generalised condition. The clinical symptomatology is variable depending on the age at time of presentation. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who presented with shoulder complaints, and in whom a radiographic diagnosis of glenoid hypoplasia had been made. From January 2002 to December 2012, 8 patients (9 shoulders) with radiological signs of glenoid hypoplasia were identified. The mean age at presentation was 39 years (range 23 to 77) and the mean symptom duration was 12.5 months (range 1 to 48).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Resurfacing of the glenohumeral joint has gained popularity since its first introduction in 1958. Advantages of resurfacing over conventional shoulder arthroplasty include preservation of humeral bone stock, closer replication of individual anatomy, reduction of periprosthetic fracture risk, non-violation of medullary canal, and ease of revision to a stemmed component if needed. We reviewed a group of patients with arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint who underwent humeral resurfacing, and who were at a minimum of two years post surgery. From January 2000 to March 2011, 51 humeral resurfacing procedures were performed in 49 patients. Patients were contacted for review, and assessed using patient reported outcome measures. An Oxford Shoulder score as well as a subjective satisfaction and outcome questionnaire was completed, as well as details regarding further surgery or revision. 2 patients had died, 11 patients were not contactable, and in 4 the medical files had been lost. In the remaining 32 shoulders, the average follow-up was 5.9 years. The mean age at time of surgery was 62.3 years (range 36 to 84).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Surgical management of younger patients requiring primary total hip arthroplasty remains challenging due to their activity level, physical demands and the need for longevity of implanted components. There is a debate regarding the most suitable means of component fixation in this difficult group. We undertook a retrospective review of a sequential group of patients who underwent uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty, were 55 years or younger at the time of surgery, and who were currently a minimum of 5 years post operation. From January 2004 to December 2006 we performed 86 primary uncemented THRs in 71 young adults. The ages ranged from 18 to 55 years with a mean of 42.9 years at the time of operation. At last review, 8 patients (9 hips) had died from unrelated causes, and 16 patients (19 hips) were lost before completing 5 years of follow-up. Complications included 1 peri-operative mortality, 10 intra-operative femoral calcar fractures, 1 revision for sepsis, 1 dislocation and 1 DVT. At a minimum of 5 years post operation there were no revisions for aseptic loosening. Uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years or younger yields good results at a minimum of 5 years.
Hip fracture is a common cause of hospital admission and is often followed by reduced quality of life, or by death. International experiences indicate there are many benefits to be gained from national hip fracture registries. This pilot project aims to implement a hip fracture registry at three sites, a large metropolitan public hospital (Flinders Medical Centre), a large metropolitan private hospital (Epworth HealthCare) and a rural regional hospital (Goulburn Valley Health) to assess the feasibility of establishing a national registry. Patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture will be recruited from the three participating hospitals between March and September 2009. A minimum data set will be collected at discharge, from hospital records. Items include patient demographics, fracture descriptors, length of stay, residential status, mobility, health status, surgical details and discharge destination. A phone interview at four months after surgery will measure outcomes by using the Extended Glasgow Outcomes Scale and documenting residential status, mobility, hip pain and readmissions. Re- operations, if any, will be collected. The availability of data from State Health Departments for validation of hospital case data will be reported. The pilot study is in progress at the time of writing. Ethical approval has been obtained, data collection, transmission and storage systems have been developed and deployed, and case data collection is underway. Case data will be summarised to describe hip fracture at the participating hospitals. Analysis will review the data elements in the pilot data set and assess their priority for inclusion in a national register—taking account of the quality of the data obtained and the time and other resources required for their collection. We will also evaluate the four-month review process. Any potential obstacles to a national registry that are identified during the pilot will be described and ways to overcome them will be proposed. A national hip fracture registry will improve the quality of care and safety of patients following hip fracture by developing an efficient mechanism to compare and improve the effectiveness of acute health care delivery by all hospitals involved in the management of hip fractures.
