Irrigation and débridement (I&D), often with exchange of modular polyethylene components, is commonly used to treat acute periprosthetic infection (PPI) following total joint arthroplasty. Two-stage revision, the “Gold Standard” for PPIs' is more invasive, requires more resources, creating controversy over recommended initial treatment of PPIs. This study seeks to determine the success rate of an “intent to treat” approach utilizing I&Ds with progression to two stage revisions as required. We retrospectively reviewed 5193 hip and knee joint arthroplasties performed over a 63 month period and identified 46 (20 female, 26 male, mean age 60) deep postoperative (within 365 days) infections that were initially managed with an “intention to treat and cure” I&D, with or without poly exchange. We investigated the overall success rate of this approach and the requirements for additional surgical procedures, as well other associated factors. 34 were managed with I&Ds only and 12 with two stage revisions as well.Background
Methods
