The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in implant position between sides in patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA and whether variation from one side to the other affected patient-reported outcomes.

A retrospective review was conducted on 207 patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA by the same surgeon from 2017–2022. Leg length, acetabular height, cup version, and coronal and sagittal stem angles were assessed radiographically and compared to the contralateral THA. Surgical approach and technology utilization were further assessed for their impact on variability. Linear regression was used to model the relationship between side-to-side variability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS).

Between sides, mean radiographic leg length varied by 4.6mm (0.0–21.2), acetabular height varied by 3.3mm (0.0–13.7), anteversion varied by 8.2° (0.0 to 28.7), coronal stem alignment varied by 1.1° (0.0 to 6.9), and sagittal angulation varied by 2.3° (0.0 to 10.5). The anterior approach resulted in more variability in stem angle position in both the coronal (1.3° vs. 1.0°, p=0.036) and sagittal planes (2.8° vs. 2.0° p=0.012) compared to the posterior approach. The posterior approach generally led to more anteversion than the anterior approach. Use of robotics or navigation for acetabular positioning did not increase side-to-side variability in cup-related position or leg length. Despite considerable side-to-side variability, Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS JR) were not affected by higher levels of position inconsistency.

Staged, bilateral THA results in considerable variability in component position between sides. The anterior approach leads to more side-to-side variability in sagittal stem angle and cup anteversion than the posterior approach. Navigation and robotics do not improve the consistency of component position in bilateral THA. Variation in implant position was not associated with differences in PROMs, suggesting that despite variability, patients can tolerate these differences between sides.

Patients with a high comorbidity burden (high-risk) can achieve similar improvements in quality of life compared to low-risk patients, but greater morbidity may deter surgeons from operating on these patients. Whether surgeon volume influences THA outcomes in high-risk patients has not been investigated. This study aimed to compare complication rates and implant survivorship in high-risk patients operated on by high volume (HV) and non-HV THA surgeons.

Patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5 and American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification of 3 or 4 undergoing primary, elective THA between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into groups based on whether they were operated on by a HV surgeon (defined as the top 25% of surgeons at our institution by number of primary THAs per year) or a non-HV surgeon. Groups were propensity matched 1:1 to control for demographic variables. A total of 1,134 patients were included in the matched analysis. Ninety day readmissions and revisions were compared between groups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate implant survivorship within the follow-up period.

Years of experience were comparable between Non-HV and HV surgeons (p=0.733). The HV group had significantly shorter surgical times (p<0.001), and shorter length of stay (p=0.009) compared to the Non-HV group. The HV group also had significantly fewer 90-day readmissions (p=0.030), all-cause revisions (p=0.023) and septic revisions (p=0.020) compared to the non-HV group at latest follow-up. The HV group had significantly greater freedom from all-cause (p=0.023) and septic revision (p=0.020) compared to the non-HV group.

High-risk THA patients have fewer 90-day readmissions, all-cause revisions, septic revisions, as well as shorter length of stay when treated by HV surgeons. THA candidates with a high comorbidity burden may benefit from referral to high-volume surgeons to reduce procedural risk and improve postoperative outcomes.