Introduction

Lateral epicondylitis, also known as “tennis elbow,” is a degenerative disorder of the common extensor origin of the lateral humeral epicondyle. The mainstay of treatment is non-operative and includes physiotherapy, activity modification, bracing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and injections. There is a subgroup of patients however who do not respond to non-operative measures and require operative intervention.

The indication for rotator cuff repair in elderly patients is controversial.

Many procedures have been described for the operative treatment of tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Arthroscopic release is a relatively recent development. The aim of this study was to review our early results of arthroscopic tennis elbow release. This was a prospective study of 28 consecutive patients with tennis elbow refractory to conservative management, who underwent arthroscopic tennis elbow release performed by one surgeon.

At surgery, arthroscopic joint assessment was performed followed by capsulectomy and debridement of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB) tendon origin using the proximal lateral and medial portals. The ECRB lesions were classified and resected with a shaver but the insertion site was not decorticated. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at 2 weeks and 3 months using the DASH score.

Of the 28 elbows 21 were noted to have a Nirschl type I lesion (intact capsule), 6 had a type II lesion (linear capsular tear) and 1 a type III (capsular rent). Degenerative articular changes were noted in 19 elbows. If arthroscopic debridement was required it was undertaken. Three elbows were noted to have eccentric radial heads. Radial plicae which were impinging on the radial head were noted in three patients. 1 patient was lost to follow up.

There was a significant improvement in DASH scores (p< 0.002) at 2 weeks post operatively. This improvement was sustained at 3 months. This is a worst case scenario analysis using a paired t test. 1 patient had post operative stiffness and 6 failed to improve of which 2 were revisions.

The early results would suggest arthroscopic tennis elbow release is an effective treatment for tennis elbow, which in addition also allows assessment of the elbow joint and the potential to address associated intra-articular pathology. This minimally invasive technique has been demonstrated to be safe and affords early post operative rehabilitation.

Many procedures have been described for the operative treatment of tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Arthroscopic tennis elbow release is a relatively recent development. The aim of this study was to review our early results of arthroscopic tennis elbow release.

This was a prospective study of 29 consecutive patients (30 elbows) with tennis elbow refractory to conservative management, who underwent arthroscopic tennis elbow release performed by one surgeon. At surgery, arthroscopic assessment of the elbow joint was performed followed by capsulectomy and debridement of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB) tendon origin using the proximal lateral, anteromedial and anterolateral portals. Associated intra-articular pathology was noted. The ECRB lesions were classified according to their gross morphology and resected with a shaver but the insertion site was not decorticated. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at 2 weeks and at 3 months using the DASH score.

29 patients with tennis elbow were treated with arthroscopic release of the ECRB origin on the lateral epicondyle. Of the 30 elbows undergoing surgery, 22 were noted to have a Nirschl type I lesion (intact capsule), 7 had a type II lesion (linear capsular tear) and 1 had a type 3 lesion (capsular rent). Degenerative articular changes were noted in 18 elbows. Arthroscopic debridement was undertaken if appropriate. Three elbows had eccentric radial heads. Radial plicae which were impinging on the radial head were present in three patients.

Mean follow up is 9 months (1–23). 1 patient was lost to follow up.

There was a significant improvement in DASH scores (p< 0.05) at 2 weeks post operatively. This improvement became more significant at 3 months post operatively. This is a worst case scenario analysis using a paired t test. 6 patients failed to improve, 1 partially improved and 1 was revised and improved.

There were no surgical complications; however, one patient has post operative stiffness which required an arthroscopic release.

The early results of this study would suggest arthroscopic tennis elbow release is an effective treatment for tennis elbow, which in addition also allows assessment of the elbow joint and the potential to address associated intra-articular pathology if required. This minimally invasive technique has been demonstrated to be safe and affords early post operative rehabilitation and return to normal activities.

We aimed to test the biomechanically predicted hypothesis that in massive rotator cuff tears irreparable by conventional methods the newly developed Nottingham Augmentation Device (NAD) would provide greater functional improvement than that gained from the gold standard of arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Thirty patients treated between 2001 and 2004 were assessed by pre- and six month post-operative Constant scoring. Fifteen underwent open acromioplasty and cuff reconstruction using the NAD (mean age 67.3), while 15 underwent a standard arthroscopic decompression (mean age 67.4). The two groups were matched retrospectively based on size of cuff tear, age and sex. Data was analysed using the student’s t-test at the 95% confidence interval. Both groups displayed a statistically significant increase in Constant score after surgery. The mean increase for NAD patients was 18.7 points compared with 17.6 points for those undergoing arthroscopic decompression. However there was no significant difference between the two groups’ improvement and this was even so in the power sub-category, where increased benefit was predicted with the NAD. The NAD requires greater surgical access, operating time and peri-operative analgesia, and no active mobilisation for six weeks. The arthroscopic technique is minimal access, rapid, involves no prosthesis or foreign body insertion and allows immediate mobilisation. However, with clear biomechanical benefits of the NAD seen in vitro, our results may simply reflect cuff tears in an older population group with irreversible tissue changes and less rehabilitative potential. A randomised prospective trial in a younger patient group with more acute tears and less tissue atrophy would appear the next step in determining the NAD’s place in the management of massive rotator cuff tears.

We report the results of a method of reconstructing massive rotator cuff (RC) tears and reinforcing the repaired RC tendons with re-tensioning of the cuff to effect reconstruction of tears which were previously considered non-repairable.

Methods A consecutive series of 37 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (range 45–80) are reported. Mean duration of pre-op symptoms was 19 (4–36) months and the mean pre-op Constant Score (CS) was 41. Insertion involved anchoring the device to the undersurface of the retracted RC tendon with Ethibond sutures, passing the other end of the device through a tunnel under the greater tuberosity and anchoring the device, under tension, to the proximal humerus with 1 or 2 screws. The proximal fixation is similar to “spot-welding” while the distal fixation is a “flexible plate” fixation.

Results The follow-up mean CS (minimum 10/12 post-op) was 54. There has been one deep infection. Two had MRI confirmed re-rupture of the RC. One case of a stiff shoulder required manipulation. This embroidered polyester augmentation device is resistant to re-tears and integrates well with medium term re-centering of the humeral head which had been superiorly displaced pre-op.