Bone and joint infections are a serious complication of trauma, surgery and soft tissue infections. However, there are few data presenting patient reported outcome measures for osteomyelitis. A recently proposed method for classification of osteomyelitis, BACH, stratifies patients into ‘uncomplicated’ and ‘complex’, based on four key inter-disciplinary components: Seventy-one patients with long-bone osteomyelitis, confirmed using a validated composite protocol, were included. Patients received a single-stage procedure at a specialist bone infection unit. Euro-Qol EQ-5D-3L questionnaires and Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) (0–100) were collected prospectively at baseline, 14 days, 6 weeks, 4 months and 1 year post-operatively. The EQ-5D-3L index score, a composite measure of performance of daily activities, was calculated from the 5 domains of the EQ-5D-3L. BACH was applied retrospectively by two independent clinicians blinded to all patient outcomes.Aim
Method
Management of bone and joint infection can be technically complex and often requires a prolonged course of antibiotics. Traditionally, bone and joint infection management utilises nurse-led outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) where adherence is unlikely to be an issue. However, with increasing evidence in favour of oral therapy, the question of adherence merits further consideration. We describe the adherence of both oral (PO) and self-administered intravenous (IV) antibiotics in the treatment of bone and joint infection using paper questionnaires (8-item Modified Morisky Adherence Score (MMAS)) and, in a subset of participants, electronic pill containers (Medication Event Monitoring Systems*). All eligible participants enrolled in the OVIVA trial (2010–2015) were randomised to six weeks of either PO or IV antibiotic treatment arms. Self-administering patients were followed up with questionnaires at day 14 and 42. A subset of PO participants was also given the medication event monitoring system* in order to validate the adherence questionnaires. The results were correlated with treatment failures at one-year follow-up.Aim
Method
Current standard of care in the management of bone and joint infection commonly includes a 4–6 week course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics but there is little evidence to suggest that oral antibiotic therapy results in worse outcomes. The primary objective was to determine whether oral antibiotics are non-inferior to IV antibiotics in this setting. This was a parallel group, randomised (1:1), open label, non-inferiority trial across twenty-six NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom. Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of bone, joint or orthopaedic metalware-associated infection who would ordinarily receive at least six weeks of antibiotics and who had received ≤7 days of IV therapy from the date of definitive surgery (or the start of planned curative treatment in patients managed non-operatively). Participants were randomised to receive either oral or IV antibiotics for the first 6 weeks of therapy. Follow-on oral therapy was permitted in either arm. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants experiencing definitive treatment failure within one year of randomisation. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7.5%.Aim
Method
To assess the influence of route of antibiotic administration on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of individuals treated for hip and knee infections in the OVIVA multi-centre randomised controlled trial. This study was designed to determine whether oral antibiotic therapy is non-inferior to intravenous (IV) therapy when given for the first six weeks of treatment for bone and joint infections. Of the 1054 participants recruited from 26 centres, 462 were treated for periprosthetic or native joint infections of the hip or knee. There were 243 participants in the IV antibiotic cohort and 219 in the oral cohort. Functional outcome was determined at baseline through to one year using the Oxford Hip/Knee Score (OHS/OKS) as joint-specific measures (0 the worse and 48 the best). An adjusted quantile regression model was used to compare functional outcome scores.Aim
Method
