Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 8 | Pages 708 - 714
22 Aug 2024
Mikhail M Riley N Rodrigues J Carr E Horton R Beale N Beard DJ Dean BJF

Aims

Complete ruptures of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the thumb are a common injury, yet little is known about their current management in the UK. The objective of this study was to assess the way complete UCL ruptures are managed in the UK.

Methods

We carried out a multicentre, survey-based cross-sectional study in 37 UK centres over a 16-month period from June 2022 to September 2023. The survey results were analyzed descriptively.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 15 - 15
10 Jun 2024
Goodall R Borsky K Harrison C Welck M Malhotra K Rodrigues J
Full Access

Background

The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is a condition specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for foot and ankle surgery. It consists of 16 items across three subscales measuring distinct, but related traits: walking/standing ability, pain, and social interaction. Although it is the most used foot and ankle PROM in the UK, initial MOxFQ validation involved analysis of only 100 individuals undergoing hallux valgus surgery. This project aimed to establish whether an individual's response to the MOxFQ varies with anatomical region of disease (measurement invariance), and to explore structural validity of the factor structure (subscale items) of the MOxFQ.

Methods

This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study involving 6640 patients (mean age 52, range 10–90 years) presenting with a wide range of foot and ankle pathologies between 2013 and 2021. Firstly, to assess whether the MOxFQ responses vary by anatomical region of foot and ankle disease, we performed multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Secondly, to assess the structural validity of the subscale items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 62 - 62
7 Aug 2023
Khatri C Harrison C Scott C Clement N MacDonald D Metcalfe A Rodrigues J
Full Access

Abstract

Background

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12-item patient reported outcome measurement instrument. It was developed with classical test theory, without testing assumptions such as unidimensionality (all items reflect one underlying factor), appropriate weighting of each item, no differential item function (DIF, different groups answer the same way), and monotonicity (people with higher function have higher score). We applied item response theory (IRT) to improve the validity of FJS to contemporary standards to optimise it for ongoing use.

Research Questions

Does the FJS reflect one latent trait? Can an IRT model be fitted to the FJS to provide interval-scaled measurement?


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXX | Pages 39 - 39
1 Jul 2012
Pollock J Rodrigues J Hasham S McCulloch T Perks A Raurell A Ashford R
Full Access

Introduction

We aimed to ascertain the oncological outcome of patients undergoing an amputation for sarcoma in our unit.

Method

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing amputation within a two-year period (2007-2009) was undertaken. Patients were identified from our sarcoma database and cross referenced with OPCS codes and HES data to ensure accuracy. A case note review was then undertaken.